Mike Richardson
Formerly known as Skink1978
To be fair it doesn't seem like people there on Saturday who saw the bird can cast much light on the ID either
Whilst photos of this record shot quality don't rule out Great Snipe they don't support it either. Where is the mid-wing pannel, where are the pale tips to the coverts framing the midwing panel, why is there a broad white trailing edge to the wing, why is the underwing pale, why does there appear to be a band on the underwing, why do the belly and underparts look pale? If the photos are all that people (who weren't there) have to go on then they are bound to ask such questions.
I'm sure if someone who was there (you?) can answer these questions then the folk who comment on the photos will be able to put these features down to being an artefact of the pics.
Perhaps the bird in the photos is not the bird that was originally found?
I must say that with recent developments in the Flamborough Great Snipe Debate, I will be feasting on humble pie for dinner tonight. I stand corrected.
In all fairness to Steve, he was unhappy with ticking the snipe from the onset and his gut feeling proved to be right.
Last edited:


