What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Conquest 10X42 HD-AllBinos Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3438884" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>Did someone call? :-O</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Lee, </p><p></p><p>Not in my book. It simply says to me he thinks they are wrong. That kind of disagreement would hardly be an unusual on the forum. We've been known to disagree ourselves. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure both you and I tried the same samples of the Conquest HD and the Terra on the Zeiss stand on the occasion Peteus is referring to. In my opinion the effective resolution of the Conquest HD samples were pretty variable and in some cases poor, the Terras were generally worse still, but one particular Terra 10x42 actually topped that particulal shoot out. Something another forum member concurred with at the time. In my opinion those Conquest HDs were disappointing for the price tag, an optical performance I've certainly seen bettered by binoculars a fraction of the price. </p><p></p><p>This is what you posted at the time:</p><p>"Best Value: Conquest HD 8x32 then in second place Terra ED 8x42 ......." </p><p></p><p>Sorry Lee, I didn't think they were as good as you made out. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>James,</p><p></p><p>Allbinos don't test effective resolution (sharpness). The astigmatism comment only refers to one form of readily identifiable edge distortion. </p><p></p><p>You may well find your Conquest HD sharp. It's entirely possible your sample might be better than those I tried. Alternatively we might have quite different expectations of resolution performance.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3438884, member: 83808"] Did someone call? :-O Lee, Not in my book. It simply says to me he thinks they are wrong. That kind of disagreement would hardly be an unusual on the forum. We've been known to disagree ourselves. ;) I'm pretty sure both you and I tried the same samples of the Conquest HD and the Terra on the Zeiss stand on the occasion Peteus is referring to. In my opinion the effective resolution of the Conquest HD samples were pretty variable and in some cases poor, the Terras were generally worse still, but one particular Terra 10x42 actually topped that particulal shoot out. Something another forum member concurred with at the time. In my opinion those Conquest HDs were disappointing for the price tag, an optical performance I've certainly seen bettered by binoculars a fraction of the price. This is what you posted at the time: "Best Value: Conquest HD 8x32 then in second place Terra ED 8x42 ......." Sorry Lee, I didn't think they were as good as you made out. ;) James, Allbinos don't test effective resolution (sharpness). The astigmatism comment only refers to one form of readily identifiable edge distortion. You may well find your Conquest HD sharp. It's entirely possible your sample might be better than those I tried. Alternatively we might have quite different expectations of resolution performance. Cheers, David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Conquest 10X42 HD-AllBinos Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top