What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Conquest 10X42 HD-AllBinos Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="james holdsworth" data-source="post: 3439221" data-attributes="member: 79864"><p>Here is Allbinos explanation about testing ''astigmatism''....</p><p></p><p>ASTIGMATISM (10 points) - We considered a level of astigmatism trying to achieve a perfect punctual image of stars. Then focusing in two different distances we measured the vertical and horizontal deformation in relation to spherical symmetry axis.</p><p></p><p>When they refer to ''perfect point-like stars'', they are referring to central sharpness.</p><p></p><p>This is their version of sharpness testing - it is not testing edge resolution or what we would consider classic astigmatism. This testing showed both samples to be ''sharper'' [if we want to use that term] than several FL's, the HT, Swaro SLC and Habicht.</p><p></p><p>I think, owing to the <em>overwhelming</em> sentiment expressed by owners / users of HD's and professional testing, that you have tested a poor sampling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="james holdsworth, post: 3439221, member: 79864"] Here is Allbinos explanation about testing ''astigmatism''.... ASTIGMATISM (10 points) - We considered a level of astigmatism trying to achieve a perfect punctual image of stars. Then focusing in two different distances we measured the vertical and horizontal deformation in relation to spherical symmetry axis. When they refer to ''perfect point-like stars'', they are referring to central sharpness. This is their version of sharpness testing - it is not testing edge resolution or what we would consider classic astigmatism. This testing showed both samples to be ''sharper'' [if we want to use that term] than several FL's, the HT, Swaro SLC and Habicht. I think, owing to the [I]overwhelming[/I] sentiment expressed by owners / users of HD's and professional testing, that you have tested a poor sampling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Conquest 10X42 HD-AllBinos Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top