What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Conquest 10X42 HD-AllBinos Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3439571" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>Jan,</p><p></p><p>I think it's more than a coincidence that the second (or third) tier models from the big three appear to fail to meet the effective resolution standards of their flagship models. (Though there appeared to be a short lived version of the ELSV 8.5x42 that didn't look so good). It seems to offer at least the possibility that by design, and/or specification they were not intended to directly compete by this measure. Makes commercial sense to me at least. Fortunately the competition don't appear to feel the same constraints. It's clearly within the capabilities of OEMs like Kamakura to produce models to a higher resolution standard than used even for the flagship models. The Opticron Aurora and the Kite Bonelli 2 are two fine examples. Why would Zeiss wan't that for a cheaper model?</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3439571, member: 83808"] Jan, I think it's more than a coincidence that the second (or third) tier models from the big three appear to fail to meet the effective resolution standards of their flagship models. (Though there appeared to be a short lived version of the ELSV 8.5x42 that didn't look so good). It seems to offer at least the possibility that by design, and/or specification they were not intended to directly compete by this measure. Makes commercial sense to me at least. Fortunately the competition don't appear to feel the same constraints. It's clearly within the capabilities of OEMs like Kamakura to produce models to a higher resolution standard than used even for the flagship models. The Opticron Aurora and the Kite Bonelli 2 are two fine examples. Why would Zeiss wan't that for a cheaper model? David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Conquest 10X42 HD-AllBinos Review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top