What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss HT wins Binocular review shootout
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 3284042" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Ian,</p><p></p><p>Only very, very good? Send them back! They should be <em>par excellence</em> for the price you paid! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> </p><p></p><p>The slight color bias that Tobias reported, that Henry saw in the SF's predecessors, and the "washed out" views some have seen with Zeiss's top models under certain lighting conditions are not deal breakers, and to quote Lennon, "Nothing to get hung about." </p><p></p><p>But what it does show are the differences between the top bananas, which was the point of Tobias's review. Those laid out, one (or one one with deep pockets, at least) could then use the review as a stepping stone to decide which top bananas he/she might be interested in and then try them, because so much about binoculars comes down to personal preference. What sounds good on paper might not look good to your eyes or feel good in your hands. </p><p></p><p>Not everybody wants to carry around a birding bin that's almost 7 inches long no matter how fantastic the optics might be. That's one reason why some people prefer Leicas. For example, the 8x42 UV is 5.6" long, just a tiny bit larger than the 8x32 SV EL which is 5.3" long. And that's just one feature and a physical attribute rather than optical. </p><p></p><p>Glad your happy with your SFs. I hope that the other top brands take note and start increasing the FOV on their bins, some of which are rather "stingy" for their price point. Ditto for the eye relief. </p><p></p><p>For me, deal killers are focusers that are too fast or too stiff, bins that show excessive veiling glare, and eyecups that don't fit my face comfortably (a frequent problem). Beyond those, there are many things I like about various binoculars, both roofs and porros. There's something out there at various price points for everybody.</p><p></p><p>Brock</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 3284042, member: 665"] Ian, Only very, very good? Send them back! They should be [I]par excellence[/I] for the price you paid! ;) The slight color bias that Tobias reported, that Henry saw in the SF's predecessors, and the "washed out" views some have seen with Zeiss's top models under certain lighting conditions are not deal breakers, and to quote Lennon, "Nothing to get hung about." But what it does show are the differences between the top bananas, which was the point of Tobias's review. Those laid out, one (or one one with deep pockets, at least) could then use the review as a stepping stone to decide which top bananas he/she might be interested in and then try them, because so much about binoculars comes down to personal preference. What sounds good on paper might not look good to your eyes or feel good in your hands. Not everybody wants to carry around a birding bin that's almost 7 inches long no matter how fantastic the optics might be. That's one reason why some people prefer Leicas. For example, the 8x42 UV is 5.6" long, just a tiny bit larger than the 8x32 SV EL which is 5.3" long. And that's just one feature and a physical attribute rather than optical. Glad your happy with your SFs. I hope that the other top brands take note and start increasing the FOV on their bins, some of which are rather "stingy" for their price point. Ditto for the eye relief. For me, deal killers are focusers that are too fast or too stiff, bins that show excessive veiling glare, and eyecups that don't fit my face comfortably (a frequent problem). Beyond those, there are many things I like about various binoculars, both roofs and porros. There's something out there at various price points for everybody. Brock [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss HT wins Binocular review shootout
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top