What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss moving out of Wetzlar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3637825" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>Hi Gijs,</p><p></p><p>This may indeed have been the case ..... in the past.</p><p></p><p>Every industry, every company is under globally competitive pressure to increase productivity. Better, higher performing products and processes for less cost. Innovate or die.</p><p></p><p>It is always a balancing act between automation capital expenditure (machinery and processes requiring specification and design, commissioning, 'fine-tuning', and ongoing calibration, adjustment, setting, maintenance and replacement of out of spec parts, etc) and labour costs (organisation, recruiting, training, leadership, equiping and productivity, and wh&s requirements etc) as well as in-house versus outsourced elements, and virtual collaborative networks.</p><p></p><p>Advanced materials and/or additive manufacturing processes could revolutionize the transformative process.</p><p></p><p>Likewise, a leaner marketing and distribution (and some sales - sorry Jan) channel will also significantly reduce costs. I don't need to see pictures of sports car driving stubble chinned macho men and even tougher leather clad women along with a plethora of dead animals to generate interest in a product. Waste of money. Money that would be better off in the consumer's pocket.</p><p></p><p>The advertising to the HunTing fraternity is not even logical - It Is redundant - surely if you can count the eyelashes on a sparrow at dusk at 400 yds with the latest and greatest bins - you should be able to see a deer sized animal prior to blowing it to smithereens! :eek!: <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>As for buildings - how wonderful to have such an income producing asset! Far from being a cost, they are revenue generating opportunities. A renewable energy harvesting skin, due design consideration for orientation, solar gain/exclusion and thermal storage, fenestration, and building envelope thermal performance, ground source thermal coupling and heat exchanged ventilation - should see all bar the most energy intensive businesses (such as smelting and processing metals etc) not only powering/providing building environment requirements, but all building power, process equipment power, and perhaps even transport power (electric vehicle recharging), and possibly excess energy sold back to the grid. It's all rather easy ...... :smoke:</p><p></p><p>Any company not going down this road is the owner of a dinosaur - not the required sustainable business of the present and future ..... :cat:</p><p></p><p>I would have thought the highly efficient, yet rather dour <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> Germans would have been on this like a seagull on a hot chip! :king:</p><p></p><p>Perhaps they are working on their sense of humour first ..... ! 3<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> o<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3637825, member: 92780"] Hi Gijs, This may indeed have been the case ..... in the past. Every industry, every company is under globally competitive pressure to increase productivity. Better, higher performing products and processes for less cost. Innovate or die. It is always a balancing act between automation capital expenditure (machinery and processes requiring specification and design, commissioning, 'fine-tuning', and ongoing calibration, adjustment, setting, maintenance and replacement of out of spec parts, etc) and labour costs (organisation, recruiting, training, leadership, equiping and productivity, and wh&s requirements etc) as well as in-house versus outsourced elements, and virtual collaborative networks. Advanced materials and/or additive manufacturing processes could revolutionize the transformative process. Likewise, a leaner marketing and distribution (and some sales - sorry Jan) channel will also significantly reduce costs. I don't need to see pictures of sports car driving stubble chinned macho men and even tougher leather clad women along with a plethora of dead animals to generate interest in a product. Waste of money. Money that would be better off in the consumer's pocket. The advertising to the HunTing fraternity is not even logical - It Is redundant - surely if you can count the eyelashes on a sparrow at dusk at 400 yds with the latest and greatest bins - you should be able to see a deer sized animal prior to blowing it to smithereens! :eek!: ;) As for buildings - how wonderful to have such an income producing asset! Far from being a cost, they are revenue generating opportunities. A renewable energy harvesting skin, due design consideration for orientation, solar gain/exclusion and thermal storage, fenestration, and building envelope thermal performance, ground source thermal coupling and heat exchanged ventilation - should see all bar the most energy intensive businesses (such as smelting and processing metals etc) not only powering/providing building environment requirements, but all building power, process equipment power, and perhaps even transport power (electric vehicle recharging), and possibly excess energy sold back to the grid. It's all rather easy ...... :smoke: Any company not going down this road is the owner of a dinosaur - not the required sustainable business of the present and future ..... :cat: I would have thought the highly efficient, yet rather dour ;) Germans would have been on this like a seagull on a hot chip! :king: Perhaps they are working on their sense of humour first ..... ! 3:-) o:) Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss moving out of Wetzlar
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top