What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss moving out of Wetzlar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tobias Mennle" data-source="post: 3638590" data-attributes="member: 117315"><p>Basically I agree, but the market seems so saturated that quite a lot of dealers sell new bins as "demos" just to be able to lower the price and get rid of a couple more. There is no point to resist. On the other hand, this brings the alpha bins too close to the upper middle class, so why take a Conquest HD or Trinovid when you can have an FL/Ultravid for a couple of hundred more.</p><p></p><p>I agree with Chosun about the need for leaner marketing and distribution. I would love to order my bins directly from the manufacturers, order two different ones for comparing, pay say a handling fee of 100.- which will be subtracted once I keep one. If it helps the manufacturers, get rid of the dealers, I have none anyway close enough to make me want to visit them. I´d also rather not choose a bin due to a 10mins observation in a shop. Even more, dealers tend to collect the lemons in their shelves instead of throwing them back at the manufacturers.</p><p></p><p>I´d love to see your calculation for producing say a Zeiss HT or SF with a QC and tolerances that would truly satisfy 95% of all users including Henry Link using it with a booster... where would prices go then? 3000EUR? Or to Nikon WX level??? </p><p> </p><p>Maybe the alpha bin will become a luxury item. Still, most people who really need or want one would be able to buy one. Cars and travels are way more expensive.</p><p></p><p>I´d also love to get to know if Swarovski does indeed have a better QC than Zeiss - very probable - and what are the differences in their processes or attitudes. I assume Leica is somewhere inbetween.</p><p></p><p>It´s not long ago that the hunting market accounted for about 75% of Zeiss Sport Optics, so I was told by a representative. What is going on with hunting world wide? And will there be an increase in nature observation? Looking at my country, I can only guess that hunting is decreasing, with older generations of hunters dying away and hunting definitely being perceived as outdated, cruel, useless by a majority. A lot of Victory FL 8x56 on eBay...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tobias Mennle, post: 3638590, member: 117315"] Basically I agree, but the market seems so saturated that quite a lot of dealers sell new bins as "demos" just to be able to lower the price and get rid of a couple more. There is no point to resist. On the other hand, this brings the alpha bins too close to the upper middle class, so why take a Conquest HD or Trinovid when you can have an FL/Ultravid for a couple of hundred more. I agree with Chosun about the need for leaner marketing and distribution. I would love to order my bins directly from the manufacturers, order two different ones for comparing, pay say a handling fee of 100.- which will be subtracted once I keep one. If it helps the manufacturers, get rid of the dealers, I have none anyway close enough to make me want to visit them. I´d also rather not choose a bin due to a 10mins observation in a shop. Even more, dealers tend to collect the lemons in their shelves instead of throwing them back at the manufacturers. I´d love to see your calculation for producing say a Zeiss HT or SF with a QC and tolerances that would truly satisfy 95% of all users including Henry Link using it with a booster... where would prices go then? 3000EUR? Or to Nikon WX level??? Maybe the alpha bin will become a luxury item. Still, most people who really need or want one would be able to buy one. Cars and travels are way more expensive. I´d also love to get to know if Swarovski does indeed have a better QC than Zeiss - very probable - and what are the differences in their processes or attitudes. I assume Leica is somewhere inbetween. It´s not long ago that the hunting market accounted for about 75% of Zeiss Sport Optics, so I was told by a representative. What is going on with hunting world wide? And will there be an increase in nature observation? Looking at my country, I can only guess that hunting is decreasing, with older generations of hunters dying away and hunting definitely being perceived as outdated, cruel, useless by a majority. A lot of Victory FL 8x56 on eBay... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss moving out of Wetzlar
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top