What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
zeiss sf 8x42 vs zeiss ht 8x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Troubador" data-source="post: 3700631" data-attributes="member: 109211"><p>Bruce is right. I had an FL 8x42 for some years and sold it a couple of years after getting an HT. There is no doubt in my mind that HT was a useful step up from FL optically but it wasn't a giant leap and the handling of HT was IMO a big improvement which I noticed because I often watch behaviour for long periods of time. The handling improvement might not be so noticeable if you only lift your binos up long enough to make an identification or find a target for your scope. Steve's summary of SF vs HT is a good one. For my kind of nature observation I find SF more useful with its unique handling balance and wide field but HT has a very nice view.</p><p></p><p>Lee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Troubador, post: 3700631, member: 109211"] Bruce is right. I had an FL 8x42 for some years and sold it a couple of years after getting an HT. There is no doubt in my mind that HT was a useful step up from FL optically but it wasn't a giant leap and the handling of HT was IMO a big improvement which I noticed because I often watch behaviour for long periods of time. The handling improvement might not be so noticeable if you only lift your binos up long enough to make an identification or find a target for your scope. Steve's summary of SF vs HT is a good one. For my kind of nature observation I find SF more useful with its unique handling balance and wide field but HT has a very nice view. Lee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
zeiss sf 8x42 vs zeiss ht 8x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top