What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss sf regular guy review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 3149381" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>Well, while we're kicking things around I might as well present an alternative to Gijs' statement in post #32, which is presented in radiomentric terms even though brightness perception is to be understood photometrically. "Photometry is the science of the measurement of light, in terms of its perceived brightness to the human eye." (Michael Bass (ed.), Handbook of Optics Volume II.</p><p></p><p>When Gijs says: it needs to be clarified that the essential factor for perceived brightness is the number of <em>lumens</em> presented to the eye. This is a color-independent measure determined by computing the dot-product (i.e., a weighted sum) of the transmission spectrum and the <em>momentary</em> spectral sensitivity function. In the mesopic or scotopic adaptive states of the retina, for example, the brightness associated with any given frequency band, i.e., perceived color, is different from what it would be in the photopic state (daylight). Moreover, it is also true that certain "colors" don't even have a spectral bad, so the perception of purple, for example, is not uniquely determined by optical transmission characteristics, but rather by the retina's momentary adaptive state in combination with it. It is a "psychophysical" phenomenon. </p><p></p><p>If it were easy to put all this into plain English, and come up with generalizations that everyone could readily understand, someone would have figured out how to do it long ago. Unfortunately, the subject of brightness remains arcane, in large part because it can't be approached without one first being willing to venture into the science of photometry. In addition, one must recognize that in real life (rather than the laboratory) the retina is constantly moving between adaptive states. </p><p></p><p>I hope this isn't offense to Gijs, who has made an outstanding effort to summarize a great deal of the complicated vision literature. Nonetheless, brightness can only be understood photometrically. </p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 3149381, member: 14473"] Well, while we're kicking things around I might as well present an alternative to Gijs' statement in post #32, which is presented in radiomentric terms even though brightness perception is to be understood photometrically. "Photometry is the science of the measurement of light, in terms of its perceived brightness to the human eye." (Michael Bass (ed.), Handbook of Optics Volume II. When Gijs says: it needs to be clarified that the essential factor for perceived brightness is the number of [i]lumens[/i] presented to the eye. This is a color-independent measure determined by computing the dot-product (i.e., a weighted sum) of the transmission spectrum and the [i]momentary[/i] spectral sensitivity function. In the mesopic or scotopic adaptive states of the retina, for example, the brightness associated with any given frequency band, i.e., perceived color, is different from what it would be in the photopic state (daylight). Moreover, it is also true that certain "colors" don't even have a spectral bad, so the perception of purple, for example, is not uniquely determined by optical transmission characteristics, but rather by the retina's momentary adaptive state in combination with it. It is a "psychophysical" phenomenon. If it were easy to put all this into plain English, and come up with generalizations that everyone could readily understand, someone would have figured out how to do it long ago. Unfortunately, the subject of brightness remains arcane, in large part because it can't be approached without one first being willing to venture into the science of photometry. In addition, one must recognize that in real life (rather than the laboratory) the retina is constantly moving between adaptive states. I hope this isn't offense to Gijs, who has made an outstanding effort to summarize a great deal of the complicated vision literature. Nonetheless, brightness can only be understood photometrically. Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss sf regular guy review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top