What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss SF vs Swaro EL SV review - in DUTCH!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bobf711" data-source="post: 3272873" data-attributes="member: 103300"><p>One thing always irritates me with these comparisons is the comment about the SV having 'better edge sharpness'.</p><p></p><p>Whilst the point is true in simple terms, that the edge of the FOV is sharp on the SV, the part of the view which constitutes the unsharp edge of the FOV on the SF, simply doesn't exist in the FOV on the SV. (444 feet versus 399 feet at 1000 yards). </p><p></p><p>Had they compared the image on the SF at 399 feet (about the 90% of FOV) would the image be sharp at that point?</p><p></p><p>Put it another way, would you sooner see movement of a bird at the edge of your field of view or simply not see it at all?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bobf711, post: 3272873, member: 103300"] One thing always irritates me with these comparisons is the comment about the SV having 'better edge sharpness'. Whilst the point is true in simple terms, that the edge of the FOV is sharp on the SV, the part of the view which constitutes the unsharp edge of the FOV on the SF, simply doesn't exist in the FOV on the SV. (444 feet versus 399 feet at 1000 yards). Had they compared the image on the SF at 399 feet (about the 90% of FOV) would the image be sharp at that point? Put it another way, would you sooner see movement of a bird at the edge of your field of view or simply not see it at all? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss SF vs Swaro EL SV review - in DUTCH!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top