What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
ZEISS TERRA ED 8x25 pocket
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CliveP" data-source="post: 3392372" data-attributes="member: 85835"><p>I'd be interested to know if possible summed up in a few words why the Swaro is easily best, the leica next and the then the Zeiss i.e the basic attributes of each that place them in this order please.</p><p></p><p>I don't own any of those you mention but to sum up all my compacts in such a manner i.e RSPB HD 8x20 first with best contrast, sharpness detail, nice blues in the colour, best build but most touchy for eye position but not terrible or anything, tie between my 8x25 Vistron and 10x25 Hawke Endurance. Vistron great handling and Hawke better contrast and more compact so about equalish. Papilio II 6.5x21(that's a tough one maybe another tie for second just a brilliant little bin or not so little and therefore not first). Carsons very close third to the above. Super compact, light weight and great clarity/contrast/sharpness and wide fov and very cheap but colour a little down on the blue side of things and more distortion than the others and little eye relief but I still love them. None of all those have CA or glare problems btw</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CliveP, post: 3392372, member: 85835"] I'd be interested to know if possible summed up in a few words why the Swaro is easily best, the leica next and the then the Zeiss i.e the basic attributes of each that place them in this order please. I don't own any of those you mention but to sum up all my compacts in such a manner i.e RSPB HD 8x20 first with best contrast, sharpness detail, nice blues in the colour, best build but most touchy for eye position but not terrible or anything, tie between my 8x25 Vistron and 10x25 Hawke Endurance. Vistron great handling and Hawke better contrast and more compact so about equalish. Papilio II 6.5x21(that's a tough one maybe another tie for second just a brilliant little bin or not so little and therefore not first). Carsons very close third to the above. Super compact, light weight and great clarity/contrast/sharpness and wide fov and very cheap but colour a little down on the blue side of things and more distortion than the others and little eye relief but I still love them. None of all those have CA or glare problems btw [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
ZEISS TERRA ED 8x25 pocket
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top