What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Terra ED vs Conquest HD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ceasar" data-source="post: 3386465" data-attributes="member: 26155"><p>I think that Jerry is right. The small exit pupil has something to do with it. There isn't much room for error when setting your IPD. The top of the line 10x32s are also much brighter than the inexpensive ones. They all don't necessarily have short eye relief. Short ER is a characteristic of Leica's 32 mm binoculars and if it doesn't bother you then I think you will be happy with it. </p><p></p><p>Nikons ER on the discontinued 10x32 LX L is 16mm and on the 10x32 EDG it is 17.3mm. And the Nikon 10x35 EII is really good. It has 13.2mm ER like the Nikon 8x30 EII. In fact they both use the same eye cups.</p><p></p><p>In my experience, the expensive 10x32s are much better than the lower priced ones.</p><p></p><p>In any case, if you haven't tried the Conquest 10x32 I think you should do so before you decide to buy it. </p><p></p><p>Bob</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ceasar, post: 3386465, member: 26155"] I think that Jerry is right. The small exit pupil has something to do with it. There isn't much room for error when setting your IPD. The top of the line 10x32s are also much brighter than the inexpensive ones. They all don't necessarily have short eye relief. Short ER is a characteristic of Leica's 32 mm binoculars and if it doesn't bother you then I think you will be happy with it. Nikons ER on the discontinued 10x32 LX L is 16mm and on the 10x32 EDG it is 17.3mm. And the Nikon 10x35 EII is really good. It has 13.2mm ER like the Nikon 8x30 EII. In fact they both use the same eye cups. In my experience, the expensive 10x32s are much better than the lower priced ones. In any case, if you haven't tried the Conquest 10x32 I think you should do so before you decide to buy it. Bob [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Terra ED vs Conquest HD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top