What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Terra ED vs Conquest HD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dialyt" data-source="post: 3392312" data-attributes="member: 43009"><p>Actually I bought direct from Amazon.co.uk not a 3rd-party seller on Amazon.co.uk. Which surprised me since Amazon are not supposed to offer open box items as new. I ordered new. It's incredibly sloppy and quite awful. They came from an Amazon warehouse in Europe, Belgium I think. I'm disgusted really but I didn't plan on keeping them anyway. But certainly I wouldn't accept for purchase a specimen that had been opened. Not only opened but well used. They're going back to Amazon and Amazon are paying the return postage cost and refunding my original postage cost.</p><p></p><p>What irritates me about the Conquest HD is that Zeiss used what is basically the same aesthetic design for two different quality ranges. The products need to be differentiated. I would suggest that Zeiss should have retained the Dialyt range as it was, instead of inventing the Conquest range. It's a bit like what Leica should have done, in my opinion, too: kept the genuine Trinovid BN range alongside the new Ultravid but I suppose that, being so good, the Trinovid would have impacted on Ultravid sales.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dialyt, post: 3392312, member: 43009"] Actually I bought direct from Amazon.co.uk not a 3rd-party seller on Amazon.co.uk. Which surprised me since Amazon are not supposed to offer open box items as new. I ordered new. It's incredibly sloppy and quite awful. They came from an Amazon warehouse in Europe, Belgium I think. I'm disgusted really but I didn't plan on keeping them anyway. But certainly I wouldn't accept for purchase a specimen that had been opened. Not only opened but well used. They're going back to Amazon and Amazon are paying the return postage cost and refunding my original postage cost. What irritates me about the Conquest HD is that Zeiss used what is basically the same aesthetic design for two different quality ranges. The products need to be differentiated. I would suggest that Zeiss should have retained the Dialyt range as it was, instead of inventing the Conquest range. It's a bit like what Leica should have done, in my opinion, too: kept the genuine Trinovid BN range alongside the new Ultravid but I suppose that, being so good, the Trinovid would have impacted on Ultravid sales. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Zeiss Terra ED vs Conquest HD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top