What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zen Ray
ZEN ED2 9x36
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="looksharp65" data-source="post: 1936029" data-attributes="member: 83771"><p>I have tried to make another graphic illustration of the binoculars' 3D-area , based on the thoughts above. I cannot guarantee they conform to scientifical proofs, however. I make no claims that the drawing is according to scale or proportional.</p><p></p><p>It needs to be pointed out that the 3D-area is not actually a flat area within the visual field, but rather a virtual volume with loose boundaries. </p><p></p><p>a= Left barrel's FOV</p><p>b= Right barrel's FOV</p><p>c= Joint sweet spot of both barrels (a floating value, dependent from judgement of sharpness)</p><p>d= Depth of field - another floating value</p><p>Red arrow= Direction of view (drawing shows the FOV and DOF from above)</p><p></p><p>I make the assumption that not the entire joint sweet spot will provide maximum 3D clues, since a minor image separation will be diminished or hidden when the viewing angle is oblique.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, I assume that the 3D-volume expands slightly behind and in front of the depth of field, since a major image separation will overrule a minor blur.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="looksharp65, post: 1936029, member: 83771"] I have tried to make another graphic illustration of the binoculars' 3D-area , based on the thoughts above. I cannot guarantee they conform to scientifical proofs, however. I make no claims that the drawing is according to scale or proportional. It needs to be pointed out that the 3D-area is not actually a flat area within the visual field, but rather a virtual volume with loose boundaries. a= Left barrel's FOV b= Right barrel's FOV c= Joint sweet spot of both barrels (a floating value, dependent from judgement of sharpness) d= Depth of field - another floating value Red arrow= Direction of view (drawing shows the FOV and DOF from above) I make the assumption that not the entire joint sweet spot will provide maximum 3D clues, since a minor image separation will be diminished or hidden when the viewing angle is oblique. Furthermore, I assume that the 3D-volume expands slightly behind and in front of the depth of field, since a major image separation will overrule a minor blur. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zen Ray
ZEN ED2 9x36
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top