BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nixterdemus" data-source="post: 2254555" data-attributes="member: 96265">Were water a tad closer I'd hear bullfrogs when silence, for the most part, prevails.  6/2010-6/2011 and fade to obscurity. Four pages w/first saying nothing about the actual results of a 9X36 ED2. Finally, at the end of page two a somewhat glowing report from a gent that's been a member since 2006 and currently has two posts under his belt.Next guy to review on page three has been a member since 11/10 and that was his only post. He concludes good, cheap and fuzzy edges.Last review on page three is critical of glare, focus wheel noise/stiffness, white spec on the lens and focus wheel cover falling off, yet they're Ridiculously awesome!. This gent has eleven posts.The start of the fourth page, post 76 lays dormant for a couple of months, wasn't a review, before I revive the subject matter of current reviews of the 9X36 ED2.I don't have to be Joe Friday to notice a developing pattern occurring. Call me crazy, yet it seems that the regulars are avoiding the 9X36 ED2 as if it were the plague and have taken a vow of silence assuming, If you have nothing good to say then say nothing posture. I'm not much on conspiracy theories and I'm all ears if I've misinterpreted the limited data.</blockquote>