What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
ZR 8x43 ed2 vs Nikon 8x32SE:a rough comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Dracon" data-source="post: 1647175" data-attributes="member: 14799"><p>Of course aperture size is the function of power and diameter of the objective lens. I have tested my SE 8x32 and Fl 8x32 against the Leupold 8x42 Internal focus Cascade several times at last light at rural landscapes. The Leupold does show a tiny bit more detail, but less field. Without an increase in power, the larger exit pupil (assuming comparable optics) should be brighter. When comparing the Nikon SE to the 'Zeiss Fl (same numbers) the Nikon edge is sharper, but the Zeiss has a slightly larger field. My eyes are incapable of discerning any difference because I don't see or look for CA.</p><p>I also do believe I lack the resolution ability I once had. John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Dracon, post: 1647175, member: 14799"] Of course aperture size is the function of power and diameter of the objective lens. I have tested my SE 8x32 and Fl 8x32 against the Leupold 8x42 Internal focus Cascade several times at last light at rural landscapes. The Leupold does show a tiny bit more detail, but less field. Without an increase in power, the larger exit pupil (assuming comparable optics) should be brighter. When comparing the Nikon SE to the 'Zeiss Fl (same numbers) the Nikon edge is sharper, but the Zeiss has a slightly larger field. My eyes are incapable of discerning any difference because I don't see or look for CA. I also do believe I lack the resolution ability I once had. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
ZR 8x43 ed2 vs Nikon 8x32SE:a rough comparison
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top