BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="NoSpringChicken" data-source="post: 1629562" data-attributes="member: 53267">I am still quite tempted to get one of these lenses, especially as it is possible to buy one from a reputable supplier for under £800 at present, using the Olympus cash back scheme. I still have one or two questions in my mind, though.The 50-200 weighs 375gm more than the 70-300. How noticeable is this in practice? My E-30 weighs more than my E-510 did and I don't want to keep adding weight.It is 6.5mm wider and 30mm longer than the 70-300. Does it feel much bulkier on the camera? I would also probably need to buy a larger holster to carry it, which would cost another £50.I have read a few comments that the lens hood on the SWD model is much larger and not as convenient as the previous model. Any comments on this?Does anyone use a protection filter on the lens and is it necessary? About another £40 for a good one.I have read quite a few comments about people having problems with this lens, including sticking seals and dead drive motors. This is a bit worrying in a semi-pro lens. Any comments?I am still undecided about whether to buy one or not so is the general opinion that it is a worthwhile upgrade from the 70-300? I have an E-14 converter but it's a shame that it's a step backwards in terms of reach but, hopefully, a step forwards for image quality.Ron</blockquote>