What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Olympus
Zuiko Digital 50-200 mm 1/2.8 - 3.5 SWD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SteveClifton" data-source="post: 1691992" data-attributes="member: 48420"><p>Hi Ron, and congratulations on the new lens. I knew you were thinking about going for one of these lenses, and was considering sending you a PM, but it seems I am too late! I notice that the Argos price is about £800, so with £50 cash back you must have paid about £750, which is what I paid 18 months ago.</p><p></p><p>As you might know I bought into the Canon system with a 40D and 100-400 zoom recently, as I was a bit frustrated with the lack of reach and rather limited range of lenses for Olympus cameras (no problems about the quality of the glass though, and the 50-200 with EC-14 is about the same as my Canon at 350mm, in both reach and sharpness). A 400mm zoom or prime, with the option of a converter, and a Sigma 150mm macro were my 'target' lenses for birding and butterflying, so now I'm quite happy.</p><p></p><p>The main reason I'm saying this, as you've probably guessed, is that I can't justify keeping both systems going, and was reluctantly thinking about advertising the Olympus lens for sale. I suppose I would be prepared to let it go to a good home for about £550. It's still in mint condition as I've hardly used it since I had the lens replaced by Olympus in June. PM me if you are interested, as I believe you still have a right to return the new lens if you bought by mail order.</p><p></p><p>all the best,</p><p></p><p>Steve</p><p></p><p>By the way Ron, regarding filters, I bought a Kenko digital protector with the Olympus lens when I bought it, and didn't notice much deterioration with it. Then when I bought the Canon lens, I bought a B+W filter to go on that lens. I've done some testing at various apertures with both lenses, with and without filters, and can conclude that the B+W filter causes noticeably less image degradation than the KenKo, though both cost around £40. Worth considering if you do buy one. B+W filters have a very good reputation in the photography world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SteveClifton, post: 1691992, member: 48420"] Hi Ron, and congratulations on the new lens. I knew you were thinking about going for one of these lenses, and was considering sending you a PM, but it seems I am too late! I notice that the Argos price is about £800, so with £50 cash back you must have paid about £750, which is what I paid 18 months ago. As you might know I bought into the Canon system with a 40D and 100-400 zoom recently, as I was a bit frustrated with the lack of reach and rather limited range of lenses for Olympus cameras (no problems about the quality of the glass though, and the 50-200 with EC-14 is about the same as my Canon at 350mm, in both reach and sharpness). A 400mm zoom or prime, with the option of a converter, and a Sigma 150mm macro were my 'target' lenses for birding and butterflying, so now I'm quite happy. The main reason I'm saying this, as you've probably guessed, is that I can't justify keeping both systems going, and was reluctantly thinking about advertising the Olympus lens for sale. I suppose I would be prepared to let it go to a good home for about £550. It's still in mint condition as I've hardly used it since I had the lens replaced by Olympus in June. PM me if you are interested, as I believe you still have a right to return the new lens if you bought by mail order. all the best, Steve By the way Ron, regarding filters, I bought a Kenko digital protector with the Olympus lens when I bought it, and didn't notice much deterioration with it. Then when I bought the Canon lens, I bought a B+W filter to go on that lens. I've done some testing at various apertures with both lenses, with and without filters, and can conclude that the B+W filter causes noticeably less image degradation than the KenKo, though both cost around £40. Worth considering if you do buy one. B+W filters have a very good reputation in the photography world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Olympus
Zuiko Digital 50-200 mm 1/2.8 - 3.5 SWD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top