The American warblers, vireos and other passerines that reach the UK in autumn are typically first-year birds and the received opinion is that they don't survive very long. I'm wondering why not. I can understand why the larger birds like cuckoos, nighthawks and Mourning Doves peg out. The cuckoos apparently can't metabolise the toxins in our caterpillars; the others may use up so much of their fat reserves on the crossing that they reach the point of no return - they can't eat enough to replenish the loss before they die. I'm sure that's true of some of the smaller birds too, but I wonder whether the problem is overstated.
As I understand it, the metabolism of warbler-sized birds is so fast that they would die within a day or so. Some do disappear almost immediately, yet more are twitchable for several days - even up to a week or so - which would suggest that at least they don't suffer an insurmountable problem on that score. Yet why are there no spring records of birds apparently returning from further south like there are with, say, Richard's Pipits? Such spring records as I can think of are all on the NW coastal areas of Britain, which suggest birds newly arrived from America rather than ones migrating on this side of the Atlantic. Any thoughts?
As I understand it, the metabolism of warbler-sized birds is so fast that they would die within a day or so. Some do disappear almost immediately, yet more are twitchable for several days - even up to a week or so - which would suggest that at least they don't suffer an insurmountable problem on that score. Yet why are there no spring records of birds apparently returning from further south like there are with, say, Richard's Pipits? Such spring records as I can think of are all on the NW coastal areas of Britain, which suggest birds newly arrived from America rather than ones migrating on this side of the Atlantic. Any thoughts?