Howard220
Well-known member
I received mine last week from Eagle Optics. I wish I could keep them, but I cannot because it takes too much effort to bring both images together, causing me eyestrain. I don't know why this is, though I know I have a "lazy eye" and it takes effort no matter what. However, these binoculars are much more difficult to use than my old Audubon 8.5x44 804R's or my much newer Nikon 9x25 Travelite V's, or even my Oberwerk 15x70's. I thought maybe it's because of the traditional porro design, widely separating the objectives (as opposed to the reverse porro Travelites), which increases parallax, but I don't have anywhere near the difficulties with the Audubons. The Yosemites appear to be in correct alignment.
Otherwise, they are fine! They're small and lightweight, have a "just right" field of view, and are sharp and contrasty on axis. However, that sweet spot is only maybe 10% of the whole field. You don't really notice it being that small until viewing critically, such as the quarter moon. Craters are visible on axis, but quickly start to smear as you go a little off axis. My Nikons do the same, but have a slightly larger sweet spot. I can at least attribute this to noticeable chromatic aberration around bright objects.
The focuser is atrocious. As one previous poster described it as "squishy," I find it just plain sloppy. You have to turn the focusing knob back and forth quite a bit, always overrunning the spot you want to be set on. God help you if you need to refocus to even a slightly different distance in order to follow a bird.
The optics are pretty much flare-free. I viewed objects within close proximity to the setting sun, and it wasn't difficult to get a good view free of flare.
With regard to eye relief, I could just about see the entire field when wearing glasses. As to close focusing, I could get as close as 12.5 feet while wearing contacts, so there was no "nearsightedness" helping me to cheat.
So there you have it. I may have to save up for, or just have a really strong need for, premium roof binoculars. But where to find a serious display of discounted premium binoculars in Tucson -- I don't know -- other than the Rangers and Audubons sold here by Wild Birds Unlimited -- and the new Rangers, people have written, aren't as good as the old ones.
Otherwise, they are fine! They're small and lightweight, have a "just right" field of view, and are sharp and contrasty on axis. However, that sweet spot is only maybe 10% of the whole field. You don't really notice it being that small until viewing critically, such as the quarter moon. Craters are visible on axis, but quickly start to smear as you go a little off axis. My Nikons do the same, but have a slightly larger sweet spot. I can at least attribute this to noticeable chromatic aberration around bright objects.
The focuser is atrocious. As one previous poster described it as "squishy," I find it just plain sloppy. You have to turn the focusing knob back and forth quite a bit, always overrunning the spot you want to be set on. God help you if you need to refocus to even a slightly different distance in order to follow a bird.
The optics are pretty much flare-free. I viewed objects within close proximity to the setting sun, and it wasn't difficult to get a good view free of flare.
With regard to eye relief, I could just about see the entire field when wearing glasses. As to close focusing, I could get as close as 12.5 feet while wearing contacts, so there was no "nearsightedness" helping me to cheat.
So there you have it. I may have to save up for, or just have a really strong need for, premium roof binoculars. But where to find a serious display of discounted premium binoculars in Tucson -- I don't know -- other than the Rangers and Audubons sold here by Wild Birds Unlimited -- and the new Rangers, people have written, aren't as good as the old ones.