It is apparent that you have neither listened to nor thought about what legitimate, skeptical scientists have been saying about various AGW hypotheses, e.g., that man is responsible for most of the global warming during the 20th Century, back radiation warms the earth, etc. It's been pointed out by many qualified physicists that these statements violate the basic principles of thermodynamics and gas chemistry. It's been pointed out by qualified applied statisticians (including me) that climate science data are often fictitious, e.g., reconstructions, and that analyses often use misrepresentations known as "lying with statistics." Critical tests are hard to come by (primarily because AGW predictions are imprecise) but a few have been performed on empirical data that clearly do not support assertions made by the IPCC and others who rely on circulation models.
BTW, your incessant use of pejoratives, as highlighted above, reflects the underlying contempt you obviously have for anyone with a different opinion. That terminology is appropriate for Holocaust "deniers," perhaps, but despicable when applied to sincere people whose only sin is to question the scientific basis for AGW. That, and being called a conspiracy theorist, is very hard to overlook.
Ed