"Regarding the validity of this test I'd call it questionable at best. While I think the publisher believes he's on to something I don't think he's conducted a worthwhile scientific test."I like many posting here I'm sure have read this particular review. I'm currently posting from my phone so not the best monitor but anyway here's what I'm seeing - in order of brightest to most dim it appears UV, SF, HT, EDG.
Regarding the validity of this test I'd call it questionable at best. While I think the publisher believes he's on to something I don't think he's conducted a worthwhile scientific test.
Make of it what you will.
Unfortunately it seems some here have the attitude that if it's not what you choose then everyone else is wrong. While there are many excellent choices out there the EDG remains among the top performing binoculars in their class and no, they are not dim.
I could further praise my 8x32 EDG for their amazing view, handling and leading focus feel but I really don't need to.
Regarding the whole purpose of this thread I'll give it away, Tom ended up with a 7x42 EDG which I'm sure he'll thoroughly enjoy and I look forward to his assessment for good, bad or indifferent.
Did you read through the methods Tobias used to conduct the test? I think it was a very worthwhile and a professionally done well controlled test. Tobias is a producer of Wildlife Documentaries and Cinematographer so he is well qualified to do this type of testing.
http://www.greatestbinoculars.com/allpages/articles/coloursandbrightness.html
Last edited: