• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Recent content by Jim LeNomenclatoriste

  1. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Gruiformes and Charadriiformes

    He cited his contemporaries, sometimes using their French name (this is verified in editions from 1758 and the followings) and that is why I remain doubtful as to the species for which the name "Bécasseau" was originally intended because ancient authors (including Linnaeus and Gmelin) linked it...
  2. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Gruiformes and Charadriiformes

    You answer one of my questions without me having to ask it
  3. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Gruiformes and Charadriiformes

    That's why I didn't understand x) Because, if ochropus is the current type species of Tringa, It doesn't say whether Linnaeus originally considered these two names to belong to two different birds. It is difficult to know what Linnaeus was thinking at this time despite the references he cited
  4. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Gruiformes and Charadriiformes

    I only find it in this edition but I have the impression that Tringa and Ochropus must have originally referred to two different species, unfortunately I don't understand the Swedish https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/view/bsb10076011?page=59
  5. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Links to digitized versions of original sources of bird names

    One of the links answers my question which was the meaning of the acronym FN behind some names, it was in fact Fauna Svecica. Do we know the publication dates of all Systema Naturae up to the tenth and if they are all online?
  6. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Links to digitized versions of original sources of bird names

    I spoke too quickly. Merci
  7. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Links to digitized versions of original sources of bird names

    It could be indeed. I'm going to read Coues' publication. Too bad this sixth edition is not elsewhere because I would like to download it Ok, you are right, the typo comes from Coues. I should have been more attentive. I wondered about the choice of the name Procellaria and obviously, this...
  8. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Links to digitized versions of original sources of bird names

    Citing Jobling: "The genus Procellaria first appears in 1746, in the sixth edition of the Systemæ Naturæ" how interpreted that ? A typo from Joblin ? 🤷 https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/key-to-scientific-names/search?q=Procellaria+
  9. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Links to digitized versions of original sources of bird names

    The Key of James Joblin says 1746 about the genus Procellaria
  10. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Links to digitized versions of original sources of bird names

    Is there an online version of the sixth edition of the Systema Naturae from 1746 ?
  11. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Nesospiza

    That's not me who's going to answer you lol
  12. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Aegithalidae

    Ok.
  13. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Aegithalidae

    Does this imply two potential species?
  14. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Nesospiza

    What justifies to keep Nesospiza and Rowettia as different genera of Melanodera? I would put everything in one genus
  15. Jim LeNomenclatoriste

    Island radiations

    Yeah thanks 😁
See more
Back
Top