• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

Eagle, Thai-Myanmar border (1 Viewer)

gandytron

Well-known member
Hi All,

I saw this eagle spp today at 1,300m asl over forest.

My thinking is that it is probably an imm Mountain Hawk-eagle, but I can't convince myself that it's not an imm. Bonellis (rare here).

It looks rather long-winged for a Spizaetus (but that might just be linked to the missing primary) and long-tailed - but if it were a Bonelli's should it not have a diagnostic dark line along the underwing greater and primary coverts (?), and the tail would be evenly barred.

If it is a hawk-eagle I think the tail is indicative of Mountain over Changeable.

Any comments welcome.

Thanks

Dave
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0045-3.jpg
    DSC_0045-3.jpg
    222.1 KB · Views: 130
  • DSC_0053-3.jpg
    DSC_0053-3.jpg
    240.3 KB · Views: 94
  • DSC_0054-3.jpg
    DSC_0054-3.jpg
    218.4 KB · Views: 105
I may be completely off track here because I do not have experience in your area, but why not Oriental Honey Buzzard?

Niels
 
Should I, like for Thai eagle, start rethinking this Mountain Hawk Eagle, we saw above hill forest in Kathmandu, Nepal? We could not see it so well in the field as this telelens-picture, corrected for anti-light. It flew all the time with the light bird, which seemed a booted eagle, but might also be juvenile MH Eagle or Honey Buzzard.
Suggestions are welcome,
Arend
 

Attachments

  • Np120929-0698 BOP4 abv Kirtipur Ktm psd.jpg
    Np120929-0698 BOP4 abv Kirtipur Ktm psd.jpg
    156.8 KB · Views: 79
  • Np120929-0696 BOP3 abv Kirtipur Ktm psd.jpg
    Np120929-0696 BOP3 abv Kirtipur Ktm psd.jpg
    77.6 KB · Views: 89
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top