-
Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.
Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Tripod sugestions please (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter TerryH
- Start date
BirdWatcher
Well-known member
I use a (Bogen) Manfreto Wilderness Tracker tripod package with fluid head.
Sturdy enough for DigiScoping but that may make it heavier than you'd like.
BirdWatcher
Sturdy enough for DigiScoping but that may make it heavier than you'd like.
BirdWatcher
Richard Ford
BF Member
Hi all
Have a look at this Velbon Delta tripod only available from http://www.at-infocus.co.uk/reviews_tripods.html I have ordered one after seeing it in the flesh a few weeks back, it is very light, tall even before the centre column is extended (ideal for stability) and is designed with birders and scopes in mind not cameras. Plus it’s only £110 or £39 if you order with a scope, the centre column also converts to a hide mount if you purchase the extra clap (£40).
I have ordered one, so I will let you know after the weekend.
Does anyone else own one?
Rich
Have a look at this Velbon Delta tripod only available from http://www.at-infocus.co.uk/reviews_tripods.html I have ordered one after seeing it in the flesh a few weeks back, it is very light, tall even before the centre column is extended (ideal for stability) and is designed with birders and scopes in mind not cameras. Plus it’s only £110 or £39 if you order with a scope, the centre column also converts to a hide mount if you purchase the extra clap (£40).
I have ordered one, so I will let you know after the weekend.
Does anyone else own one?
Rich
digi-birder
Well-known member
Manfrotto 443 for me too - with the 128RC fluid head.
I upgraded from the Manfrotto 190CL, which was very heavy. The 443 is very light and I ahve carried it around for some time without getting shoulder ache.
I had a look at the Velbon and just didn't like the quality at the side of the Manfrotto - just personal choice. Try and see them both side-by-side.
I upgraded from the Manfrotto 190CL, which was very heavy. The 443 is very light and I ahve carried it around for some time without getting shoulder ache.
I had a look at the Velbon and just didn't like the quality at the side of the Manfrotto - just personal choice. Try and see them both side-by-side.
Ultra lightweight at this end..... Velbon Sherpa Pro Carbon @ 1.1kg (even less with 2/3 of the centre column removed) and the lightweight Velbon PH157Q pan head (500g). I've been more than happy with mine for 18 months or so of heavy digiscoping (cp990/cp4500 + Swarovski AT80HD + Dual Force Pro battery pack).
I like the ability to spread the 'pod legs open to get very low working heights (about 15cm on the 5300, with centre column split), this gives a rock solid support and eliminates all but the strongest wind-shake...though you have to sit down 3
I also prefer twist-lock legs to the noisy snappy type.
I used to use the Slik D3 for many years(still got it)... I realy like the D3 head but it's a bit heavy on my 'pod.
'Pods and heads are very personal items..... so to try before buying.
Andy
I like the ability to spread the 'pod legs open to get very low working heights (about 15cm on the 5300, with centre column split), this gives a rock solid support and eliminates all but the strongest wind-shake...though you have to sit down 3
I also prefer twist-lock legs to the noisy snappy type.I used to use the Slik D3 for many years(still got it)... I realy like the D3 head but it's a bit heavy on my 'pod.
'Pods and heads are very personal items..... so to try before buying.
Andy
Phil
Member
Tony,
I also own a manfrotto 055 nat2 tripod which I use with a 128RC head. The 128 is heavier and feels more solid but the 700 is considerably lighter. Both are stable and the movement is equally smooth. One snag I did have is that the 200CZ1 plate specially machined for the Zeiss Diascope cannot be used on the 700 head because with the 700 the scope sits length ways along the plate rather than across, if that makes sense. Having said that I have not had any problems so far with the scope becoming loose on the standard plate supplied with the head.
Phil
I also own a manfrotto 055 nat2 tripod which I use with a 128RC head. The 128 is heavier and feels more solid but the 700 is considerably lighter. Both are stable and the movement is equally smooth. One snag I did have is that the 200CZ1 plate specially machined for the Zeiss Diascope cannot be used on the 700 head because with the 700 the scope sits length ways along the plate rather than across, if that makes sense. Having said that I have not had any problems so far with the scope becoming loose on the standard plate supplied with the head.
Phil
wizard
Well-known member
i use the 290N Manfrotto being green with no reflective bits it suited me, i looked at the SilkD5 but it was too flash as i like to see the birds and not the other way around. with so many to try it's down to what you want in the end, i would have liked mine to go right down almost to the ground but it is low enough & will last me a life time. you pays ya money.........