• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Starling, or what? (1 Viewer)

Phil Juvet

Well-known member
Another eastern bird I have never seen here in Calif.. Taken in Chestnut Hill, MA.
 

Attachments

  • Starling_01.jpg
    Starling_01.jpg
    262.2 KB · Views: 87
  • Starling_02.jpg
    Starling_02.jpg
    257.6 KB · Views: 81
Looks to be an immature Red-winged Blackbird

Wouldn't this be awfully early for an immature Red-winged Blackbird in Massachusetts? Birds of North America online suggests that they should only be nest building in late April in the Northeast. Why isn't this an adult female?
 
Wouldn't this be awfully early for an immature Red-winged Blackbird in Massachusetts? Birds of North America online suggests that they should only be nest building in late April in the Northeast. Why isn't this an adult female?

Because a female is a very different animal - much browner, with a wide, pale supercilium, thin malar, and lots of buff to peachy suffusion to the face. Looks like this. Note also how the breast and belly are more 'dark streaks on white' rather than the reverse.

This is a bit odd, though - I've seen lots of Red-winged Blackbirds, early in the year (thanks to banding operations I've worked on), and I have never seen one that looks quite like this. Usually, the immature (or, as I prefer, SY*) males have a fair amount of pale edging to the plumage, and their epaulets are not so red as the "definitive" males, but they aren't like this. This one looks like a male that has retained a lot more of the juvenile plumage than it had any right to. I really can't explain that part. Still, I remain confident that it's a male.

Peter C.


*Here we encounter the reason why I'm always harping on to people (not on Birdforum, so much, but elsewhere) about the importance of being careful with terminology. Immature is a bit of a fuzzy word - when speaking of bird moult, it can mean different things to different people. How old does a bird have to be, before it is no longer an 'immature'? Depends on the species...

But what you mean by this, I gather from context, is what I would call "juvenile" - fledged, fully-feathered, but not "adult". But this is not (at least I don't imagine) what KC meant back in post #2 - in the context of spring songbirds, immature means "born last year", i.e. has only gone through one pre-basic moult (which would have happened last fall). This plumage is what I would call 'second year' or just SY. Lots of passerines have an SY plumage that is virtually indistinguishable from the "definitive" adult (or, ASY) plumage - e.g. most sparrows, many warblers, etc. A few, though, show obvious differences between second-year and subsequent years - such as male American Redstarts, and this species.

I can't recall, off the top of my head, just how much of a moult (if any) that Red-wingeds have in spring, but that may influence what the birds look like in early spring.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top