Thanks Bob
I have the 7X36 Diamondback in my possession at the present time. Yesterday morning, under bright clear conditions, I compared them to the Minox 10X44 BP and the Kruger Caldera 8X42. To my eyes, the Minox wins buy a land slide in terms of resolution-sharpness,color rendition,light transmission,reach out and touch it realism, pop, wow factor, whatever you want to call it. The Diamondback, for me, was a lot sharper than the Caldera, and had more neutral color as well. FOV was about the same on the Vortex and the Kruger, much narrower on the Minox. Ca was similar in all three, although the Caldera might be a tiny bit better in that department. I think that I might be more prone to seeing CA than most people. Edge sharpness on the Vortex was not as good as the other two, but the FOV is so large it didn't detract from the view much at all. From what I read, binoculars that are sharp to the edge have the rolling ball effect, so may be it was a design choice. I don't seem to be bothered by the globe effect in binoculars. These are my opinions, but I understand if others with more experience in judging optics don't agree .
The Diamondbacks I have now will go to someone as a gift. I was thinking of ordering a pair for myself to get that huge FOV. That's the reason for the question about the Fury.
Thanks Bruce