> 5. Light weight and great for my hands (483g naked)
That's very close to mine which weighs 487 g naked.
In addition to the weight spec being incorrect on the Sightron website, has anyone pointed out that the FOV spec is incorrect as well? The website claims the FOV is 420 feet @ 1,000 yards, but I think the FOV is actually very close to 7.5 degrees.
Someone earlier on this thread compared Bushnell Ultra Legend 8x36 to the Blue Sky. I have both models too. The Bushnell has a larger FOV, but a smaller sweet spot. It has higher center resolution, and I prefer the focuser of the Bushnell. The focuser of the Blue Sky is slow and somewhat stiff.
The Blue Sky is lighter and has a larger (though not great) sweet spot, very neutral color rendition, and shows great control of glare.
That's very close to mine which weighs 487 g naked.
In addition to the weight spec being incorrect on the Sightron website, has anyone pointed out that the FOV spec is incorrect as well? The website claims the FOV is 420 feet @ 1,000 yards, but I think the FOV is actually very close to 7.5 degrees.
Someone earlier on this thread compared Bushnell Ultra Legend 8x36 to the Blue Sky. I have both models too. The Bushnell has a larger FOV, but a smaller sweet spot. It has higher center resolution, and I prefer the focuser of the Bushnell. The focuser of the Blue Sky is slow and somewhat stiff.
The Blue Sky is lighter and has a larger (though not great) sweet spot, very neutral color rendition, and shows great control of glare.
Last edited: