• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Best ID guide for Belize (1 Viewer)

Allen

Well-known member
Does anyone have a view on which is the better guide to take to Belize? Based on what I can find there are 2 options:

“Birds of Belize” by H. Lee Jones and Dana Gardner and the “Peterson Field Guide to Birds of Northern Central America (Peterson Field Guides)” by Jesse Fagan and Oliver Komar, and illustrated by Robert Dean and David Beadle.
 
Thanks, illustrations look decent based on the samples shown albeit one of the Trogons looks like its about to topple backwards off the branch!
 
Thanks, illustrations look decent based on the samples shown albeit one of the Trogons looks like its about to topple backwards off the branch!
I would think it's the most up to date and detailed, with generally very good illustrations.

It's also worth considering the Belize pack for Merlin, if you want something for a smartphone.
 
I have used the Petersen guide mentioned above, not in Belize but Mexico (Southern part of their Yucatan peninsula), and for me it worked well.

Today, I would not travel without the appropriate pack of Merlin (for those regions where one exist) to aid with sounds and photos of some species. The pack is downloaded, so you do not need connection while in the field. To me it is not (yet?) good enough to not also bring a field guide.

Niels
 
I agree with the Peterson guide, in my opinion much better than the Belize guide. But the Merlin pack in this area should be well completed and as an addition is really helpful. Bu i also wouldnt like to miss the field guide for preparation.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top