• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

European Breeding Bird Atlas 2 (1 Viewer)

John Cantelo

Well-known member
My copy of this monumental book (in every sense of the word) arrived this morning the day after publication (unlike 'All the Birds of the World' for which I had to wait for almost two weeks!). It is such an important work that I feel it deserves a thread of its own. My initial impressions are overwhelmingly positive, It's well-produced, beautifully designed and enhanced by gorgeous artwork (disappointingly, though, there's no list of artists & the birds that they illustrated). Another huge positive is that Turkey and European Russia are now included. Clearly, the progress in analysing data and presenting the fruits in map form since the original in 1997 has been enormous. The main maps are large and most species have three maps (abundance, breeding evidence/possibility of occurrence and 'change'), scarcer species have two and newly covered species (i.e. from Russia or Turkey) one. The text is necessarily concise but seems very well done and complements the maps well pointing out any deficiencies or problems. The taxonomy is well up to date which has caused some problems with species that weren't 'split' when the earlier atlas appeared but this has been handled deftly. I was though, disappointed that the division between Hooded & Carrion Crows wasn't mapped (the two being 'lumped'). Whichever way you look at it the tome's a terrific benchmark deserving of the highest accolades.
 
Thus far the only irritant I've found is where the text refers to the 'European breeding population' (or similar) for those species (Dead Sea & Pale Sparrows, several wheatears, etc) found in areas included in the atlas but which have never been regarded as part of Europe (or at least not by any definition of Europe of which I'm aware). That is those areas east of the Bosporus (save Cyprus) and south of the Caucasus. However, I suppose greater precision would have meant the use of some awkward combination of words since I don't think, surprisingly, that there's a portmanteau word that includes Europe, Asia Minor (aka Asian Turkey), Armenia, Georgia & Azerbaijan. Perhaps someone could invent one - in the spirit of these post(?)-Trumpian times, Euramaga, perhaps ;).
 
Would they fit into Western Palearctic? If the book does not include Africa north of the Sahara and some of those species have populations there, then that might explain avoiding this expression.

Niels
 
I don't have English Collins, but the Czech version uses "the area described" for, well, the area described in the book (when generalizing ranges, populations) because it's not Europe, but it's also not the entire WP. It's short and clear in Czech (thanks to grammar), but it's still a little annoying and not really solvable, because of the vast tracts of Africa included. For the breeding atlas, they should have just started the book with 'definition: "Europe" for our purposes means ....' and it would be probably best. Not like the Europe/Asia distinction makes much natural sense anyway.
 
My copy of this monumental book (in every sense of the word) arrived this morning the day after publication (unlike 'All the Birds of the World' for which I had to wait for almost two weeks!). It is such an important work that I feel it deserves a thread of its own. My initial impressions are overwhelmingly positive, It's well-produced, beautifully designed and enhanced by gorgeous artwork (disappointingly, though, there's no list of artists & the birds that they illustrated). Another huge positive is that Turkey and European Russia are now included. Clearly, the progress in analysing data and presenting the fruits in map form since the original in 1997 has been enormous. The main maps are large and most species have three maps (abundance, breeding evidence/possibility of occurrence and 'change'), scarcer species have two and newly covered species (i.e. from Russia or Turkey) one. The text is necessarily concise but seems very well done and complements the maps well pointing out any deficiencies or problems. The taxonomy is well up to date which has caused some problems with species that weren't 'split' when the earlier atlas appeared but this has been handled deftly. I was though, disappointed that the division between Hooded & Carrion Crows wasn't mapped (the two being 'lumped'). Whichever way you look at it the tome's a terrific benchmark deserving of the highest accolades.
The video you had linked to in the previous thread definitely convinced me of the great quality of this book. I never warmed up to the first edition, but this one fills in most gaps very nicely.

Apparently, many felt the same and thus Lynx can't ship any more new orders till January 18th. Thus no more Christmas treats if you have not ordered earlier.
 
Last edited:
My copy of this monumental book (in every sense of the word) arrived this morning the day after publication (unlike 'All the Birds of the World' for which I had to wait for almost two weeks!). ..... The taxonomy is well up to date which has caused some problems with species that weren't 'split' when the earlier atlas appeared but this has been handled deftly. I was though, disappointed that the division between Hooded & Carrion Crows wasn't mapped (the two being 'lumped'). ....
Not got mine yet, but from excerpts I've seen in their promo material, I'd say the same disappointment for their treatment of Stonechats
 
To not-bibliophiles and those whose coffee table was already filled by other books ;) when this content will be available as a free pdf?
 
To not-bibliophiles and those whose coffee table was already filled by other books ;) when this content will be available as a free pdf?
Why would they do that when they're still making money on the actual book, I think that's a long way off?

The strange thing is, in the UK anyway, e-books are sometimes more, or at least as expensive, as a hard copy.
 
Now received mine; and have to say with I agree with of the posts above. 'Monumental' indeed - I'm sure this is the biggest, heaviest, most unwieldy book I've ever seen. I imagine Lynx were tempted to split it into 3-4 volumes !
 
the biggest, heaviest, most unwieldy book I've ever seen
That is why a dead tree is much worse medium for EBBA than pdf or a website.

Especially a website - it would reach so many people, that its impact would outweigh the monetary gain from sales of the book. I can imagine it would reach a huge number of casual birders and non-birding people somehow involved in conservation and land management.

And EBBA as a website would have more advantages. One could, for example, use different scales, or overlay different maps (habitats, cities, past data etc., even some environmental indices like pesticide use). One could update it fluidly, and people could see themselves how the freshness of data in, for example, Urals compares with, for example, the Netherlands.

By the way, I did not visit a physical library since years. I think most of young people, too. The whole younger generation of birders will probably overlook the EBBA completely, and look for data on free websites.
 
Now received mine; and have to say with I agree with of the posts above. 'Monumental' indeed - I'm sure this is the biggest, heaviest, most unwieldy book I've ever seen. I imagine Lynx were tempted to split it into 3-4 volumes !
At 5kgs, almost certainly the heaviest book I've ever owned or held!
 
Well, the EBBA2 website states "The Atlas database will be available for further scientific work." It's not the case as of now as far as I can tell, but hopefully it will be in the future?

In any case, I agree with jurek, having all of this insane data effort end up in a book that's not available for free just because of "sales" would be outrageous to all the volunteers involved. In general it seems to me that there is quite a lot being sacrificed to some people's dream of this being "a book". Hopefully the promised data release occurs and that will be the actually useful output.
 
call me old fashion but i prefer always a book over digital content....... and the paper is mostly recycled i think

Nothing prevents continuing to sell a beautiful bibliophile tome with glossy paper, nice pictures, etc., and put the content online, where it can reach many people involved in land management etc., and be linked to geographical maps, maps of land use etc. They are largely separate groups of people: libraries and nature book collectors; and internet users.

Imagine that EBBA makes an app and website: which birds live around your home? And essentially, offers the EBBA data linked to the location of the computer. It could be a single most popular promotion of bird conservation in Europe ever.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 1 year ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top