• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Falcon (Italy, Parco Naturale Alpi Marittime, August 5, 2022) (1 Viewer)

Frank-birding

Frank van de Velde
Supporter
Yesterday I saw this Falcon (Lanner?) in the Alpi Marittime nature reserve.

It was exactly at the top of the Colle di Fenestrelle mountain pass (2463m). The birds were higher, 2700m, up at the higher rock face.
Time: 10:30, Date: 5th of August 2022.

I’m fairly sure I saw 2 of these large Falcons hunting together.
In any case they alarmed a female Kestrel, that flew panicking and loudly alarming around too. One of the large Falcons ended up with a prey in it’s talons.

When higher up in the sky, the possible Lanner was gliding in flight, not moving its wings.

It was quite a lot bigger and bulkier than the female Kestrel.

My first impression was juvenile Peregrine, then I realised that the heavier body streaking, buff colour and unmarked vent might point to Lanner. In both cases the black (sub)terminal tail band confuses me however.

Any help in ID-ing this bird would be much appreciated!

(Washed-out images by phone from the back of the camera unfortunately, as I’m currently away from my computer… I can attach the original ones later .)

Regards,
Frank van de Velde
 

Attachments

  • 4338A7D2-9503-4042-851F-AAFAA1E19520.jpeg
    4338A7D2-9503-4042-851F-AAFAA1E19520.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 45
  • E912CCF0-92F0-4F17-8E72-1A8D6ADE1127.jpeg
    E912CCF0-92F0-4F17-8E72-1A8D6ADE1127.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 39
  • 3430CCFA-9D96-418D-86C8-9A7C63E756C4.jpeg
    3430CCFA-9D96-418D-86C8-9A7C63E756C4.jpeg
    934.4 KB · Views: 39
  • 78CBC8CC-5032-49A0-98A4-47AEDF79F6D8.jpeg
    78CBC8CC-5032-49A0-98A4-47AEDF79F6D8.jpeg
    713.3 KB · Views: 38
  • A18D1015-E7C0-45C4-A877-1A574036D52C.jpeg
    A18D1015-E7C0-45C4-A877-1A574036D52C.jpeg
    627.6 KB · Views: 43
  • 64C2C529-DF12-483C-B4E8-393A810C9B28.jpeg
    64C2C529-DF12-483C-B4E8-393A810C9B28.jpeg
    908.2 KB · Views: 46
  • BEAB2644-F67A-43FE-BD1B-754D092C1E83.jpeg
    BEAB2644-F67A-43FE-BD1B-754D092C1E83.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 43
  • 805B33A9-8EA4-47D0-BDF4-CDD47F6EC9CF.jpeg
    805B33A9-8EA4-47D0-BDF4-CDD47F6EC9CF.jpeg
    922.3 KB · Views: 40
  • 7F7FA111-8E48-49DD-A5B2-B81961DE639D.jpeg
    7F7FA111-8E48-49DD-A5B2-B81961DE639D.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 45
  • F3DBF0A5-A378-4EF4-87FE-7F3B59260CEC.jpeg
    F3DBF0A5-A378-4EF4-87FE-7F3B59260CEC.jpeg
    601 KB · Views: 44
  • 1CA76C90-B2EC-4BDB-AE29-B8FB558E24F5.jpeg
    1CA76C90-B2EC-4BDB-AE29-B8FB558E24F5.jpeg
    811.9 KB · Views: 44
  • 58C99E0B-9C99-43FF-B457-66D255C5D24D.jpeg
    58C99E0B-9C99-43FF-B457-66D255C5D24D.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 40
  • 81B40DC2-84AB-414D-966F-E29805391531.jpeg
    81B40DC2-84AB-414D-966F-E29805391531.jpeg
    968.4 KB · Views: 41
  • F53DC7A8-3B9F-4593-B7D7-2D21A4F36C0B.jpeg
    F53DC7A8-3B9F-4593-B7D7-2D21A4F36C0B.jpeg
    771 KB · Views: 35
  • 96B9FBE2-E780-4EC3-8238-21B2B02583FB.jpeg
    96B9FBE2-E780-4EC3-8238-21B2B02583FB.jpeg
    1.1 MB · Views: 32
  • 08FFEB7A-959A-4057-AF12-34B648B2B6A8.jpeg
    08FFEB7A-959A-4057-AF12-34B648B2B6A8.jpeg
    732.8 KB · Views: 35
  • 200042FE-38C5-41DF-9300-C42EDA81E468.jpeg
    200042FE-38C5-41DF-9300-C42EDA81E468.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 49
Apart from what you say about its relative size... it's a kestrel.
Thank you Butty for solving my ID question! It also explains the dark tail band. The size must have been a trick of the eye.

Or would you think the bird pictured straight above, against the sky, in the last images might have been another bird? That was actually the one looking so large and bulky. But I assume that this one also is a Kestel.

Bye, Frank
 
Warning! This thread is more than 2 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top