• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Long-tailed Tit Taxonomy (1 Viewer)

Hello
I hope someone can help me figure out the distribution of the 13 races (I know what they are) of Long-tailed Tit (Aegithalos caudatus) in the European area!
I am currently doing a piece of university work that involves creating a research proposal (totally fictional) that includes a molecular genetic technique and I have chosen to write a proposal unravelling the phylogeography of the long-tailed tit cause its my fave bird!

Anyway I did find what I thought was a race distribution map online but the link didn't work....so can anyone help distribute the races quite specifically - provide a link or map or anything that helps me partition a map of europe myself.

Many Thanks

John
 
well in Europe strictly the 10 i come up with are
caudatus
europaeus
taiti
aremoricus
rosaceus
macedonicus
alpinus
irbii
italiae
siculus


I was hoping someone could help with the areas for alpinus!
 
Hi John,

Kren's Birds of the Czech Republic lists caudatus and europaeus (and everything in between) as occuring in the country.

Adam
 
John,
You forgot tephronotus for Europe. For alpinus I have only a rather schematic SE Azerbaijan, N Iran. The Clements offers that it also occurs in SW Turkmenistan.
 
Well I have included
caudatus Scandinavia, Poland & Russia
europaeus Continental Europe
taiti Pyrenees, Cantabria & Northern Portugal
aremoricus NW France
rosaceus Great Britain & Ireland
macedonicus Balkans – Albania, Greece, S Bulgaria
irbii Central & Southern Spain, Corsica
italiae Italy
siculus Sicily
tephronotus Turkey
These are just added into the map!
major Caucasus (Georgia, Armenia)
passeki SE Turkey? (usually Iran)
tauricus Southern Crimea
alpinus SE Azerbaijan, N Iran

Anyone know who first described A. caudatus major and when?????
sibiricus Siberian areas
 
Here in Lithuania, the predominent is caudatus - the race is a widespread breeder in (fairly) low density, an abundant passage migrant, especially so in autumn and a winterer in moderate numbers. Race europaeus is rare, though there were a number of records this last autumn (a record year for migration of LTT, many thousands per day moving through at peak period).

Interesting, I have a flock of six LTT at my feeders currently - five are clear caudatus, but the sixth shows characteristics of europaeus and, I believe, to be an intergrade/hybrid
 
John,

From Howard & Moore (2003):

A.c.caudatus (Linnaeus, 1758) - N and E Europe, N Asia east to Kamchatka and south to N Mongolia, NE China, N Korea, Hokkaido

A.c.rosaceus (Mathews, 1937) - British Isles

A.c.europaeus (Hermann, 1804) - Denmark and E France to NE Croatia and W and S Romania

A.c.aremoricus (Whistler, 1929) - W France

A.c.taiti (Ingram, 1913) - N Portugal, NW Spain, Pyrenees

A.c.irbii (Sharpe & Dresser, 1871) - S Iberia, Corsica

A.c.italiae (Jourdain, 1910) - C and S mainland Italy

A.c.siculus (Whitaker, 1901) - Sicily

A.c.macedonicus (Dresser, 1892) - SW Croatia, Albania, Macedonia and N Greece

A.c.tephronotus (Gunther, 1865) - S and E Greece, W and C Turkey

A.c.tauricus (Menzbier, 1903) - Crimea

A.c.major (Radde, 1884) - NE Turkey, Caucasus area

A.c.alpinus (Hablizl, 1783) - SE Azerbaijan, N Iran

A.c.passekii (Zarudny, 1904) - SE Turkey, SW Iran

A.c.vinaceus (J. Verreaux, 1871) - C and NE China (E Qinghai to Gansu and Hebei)

A.c.glaucogularis (F. Moore, 1854) - N of E China (Shaanxi and Hubei to Zhejiang)

A.c.trivirgatus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1848) - Honshu (Japan)

A.c.kiusiuensis (N. Kuroda, Sr., 1923) - Kyushu and Shikoku (Japan)

A.c.magnus (Clark, 1907) - C and S Korea, Tsushima I. (Japan)
 
Last edited:
sibiricus - never heard of it. If someone has proposed it, it was apparently not deemed sufficiently different from race caudata (the Siberian ranger) and therefore either considered consubspecific or submerged within caudata.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top