Nice blog pic Andy. Apparently the lack of fieldcraft/ignorance on display by the trio in the pic was quite exceptional by all accounts!!
The guy in the front was reported to be stood in the middle of the meadow a couple of hundred yards out from Tower Hide. He was scoping Grey Herons believing they might have been the cranes – not only was he disturbing everything else on the ings (and the meadow), but if they were the cranes (they weren’t) then the trio would have flushed them. Such selfish behaviour would ensure that people arriving later would be frustrated to say the least.
It is easy to work out where the path is on Wheldrake Ings, you don’t need to be a rocket scientist, but these folk clearly couldn’t work it out between them……..if ‘birdwatchers’ can’t follow the rules how do you go about explaining that there is no access to these areas for a good reason to the dog-walkers, walkers, chavs, trials bikers etc?
The solution to this sort of behaviour is to not release news of decent birds on the reserve…..and that would be a shame!
Right, I have something to say here. I was one of the "Idiots" at wheldrake yesterday. That's me in the middle of the picture. So to all you high and mighty people who think you can tell everyone what is right and what is wrong then listen up. When I got to Wheldrake centre I was told by the bloke there that the cranes were back along the road towards Crockey Hill. I drove back down the road and scoured all the fields. I then met the other "Idiot" in the photo who told me they were back where I had started. We went all the way back and climbed the elevated watchtower, scouring for 20 minutes and seeing nothing. Someone then told us that they were another mile down the road. When we got to the bridge we knew nothing about the area as it was the first time we had visited it. We scanned with our scopes from the gate and saw some very faint birds almost on the horizon. Not knowing even if the birds were there I spotted what I took to be a stile and a path running through the field. The other bloke charged on ahead much further than my wife and I. At all times on our way accross the field we were very concious of being out in the open but we were so far away from any of the water and birds that we would not at any time have spooked anything. If I can't even make out through a scope whether a bird is a crane or a heron then I am hardly close enough to spook it am I? My wife and I walked as close to the hedge as we could without having the birds disappear behind the bush which was in front of them. We only walked about 200 yards into the field and were still miles away from any of the birds. The other bloke who I do not know at all was right in the middle of the field and a damn sight further ahead of us. We had no clue that the path through the field was not used all the time, there were no signs saying keep out of the field and as I said earlier there is what appears to be an old kind of stile at the fence. So to the sanctimonious idiot who tried to throw the book at me when I got back I say this. If you are really a volunteer warden as you said you were then why not make it clear to other "idiots" that the field is off limits. I AM a volunteer warden at a nature reserve and if we don't want people going in certain places we let them know with signs. What we don't do is to secretly take pictures of them and then call them idiots on our blogs to make ourselves look like perfect birders when we know we are almost all guilty of some kind of misdemeanour.
I love and respect wildlife and would never do anything to spook or disturb birds or any other animal intentionally. I went in the field yes, but at no time did I upset or intimidate any creature, as at all times I am aware of what I am doing. You may like to try to make everyone think I was sat next to the birds with my scope wanting a ride on their backs but in reality I was careful, considerate and bloody MILES AWAY! If you put as much time into the management of the area as you do on your self promoting blog then visitors would know what is and isn't allowed.