FUZZYBUZZARD
Member
As far as I can ascertain, metcow333 has never claimed to be the finder of these birds, in fact he raises some extremely pertinent points regarding to the welfare of not only these wintering birds but also the welfare of other resident species which are also susceptible to disturbance. I can't quite fathom how been the finder would automatically allow one to decide who gets to see them and who doesn't, surely that is up to the landowner? There is certainly a degree of responsibility on any individual who takes it upon themselves to give out their precise location. I question whether this was even considered. The couple who gained permission to go inside the clay pigeon club did exactly the right thing and I'm sure no criticism was aimed their way. However there were other 'birders' who were walking on private land straight towards the roost site and this is the kind of neglectful behaviour that not only angers the landowners but also virtually guarantees the premature departure of these spectacular birds. These birds have been present for some considerable time but have decreased in number since their presence has been made public. The nature of SEO's means that all who want should be able to see them without too much difficulty. Furthermore my 8 year old son could get a good photo of these birds (and has done so) without having to stick a 500mm lens down their throats. Nuff said!!!And you found these birds yourself??I think not!!!