Inital Impressions of the Prime HD Wide Angle
The Zen-Ray Prime HD 25-50X Spotting arrived today so I thought I would post some initial information on it while the 15% coupon code is still good at Wayfair. (I noticed the sale price is off right now, but it may pop back up.)
I need to note that I have not had a lot of scope experience. 99% of my viewing over the years has been with binoculars. I find scopes to be somewhat of a pain to use, but there are times when it would be nice to have one. My previous scope (which I still have) is an older B & L 60mm Elite which was ok for the shooting range but I never used it for wildlife viewing. It was a difficult decision in choosing a new scope for field use but I concluded that if I made too many compromises in quality to save a buck, it would sit on the shelf and not get used. Hopefully the ZR will be a good balance between a 3K+ alpha and something on the low end.
Keeping in mind my limited scope experience, I was very pleased with the Prime HD view. I have looked though some top end scopes during the last year, but the time was limited and I do not feel comfortable relying on my memory to say as to what the degree the ZR compares. With that in mind, I suspect the ZR will compare well.
The view was nice and sharp and contrast looked good at 25X. The view was somewhat less sharp at 50X, but at least some of that was due to the viewing conditions. I could see the heat waves coming off the ground. The edges held up well at both power ranges. I expected things to get noticeably darker at 50X but it did not. There was a small amount of barrel distortion at 25X out about the last 10 - 15% of the view, but I would say horizontal lines at the edge were straight at 50X. I picked up what appeared to be slight rolling ball at 25X, but nothing that would bother me like it does in a 8.5X42 Sarovision. CA was minimal. It was very difficult to detect in the center area and was not much more near the edges. I an one of those that only notices CA when I look for it.
Because of my limited memory of past views and less than extensive scope experience, I will not know how good the ZR Prime HD really is until I get a chance to do some side by side comparisons with other scopes. I hope to do that in a few weeks with a Kowa 884 using the new Prominar Kowa eye piece. That should be a good benchmark! I have looked through the Kowa this last summer and I am thinking the ZR will come a lot closer than the price difference would indicate.
The eye cup has five positions. It worked best for me extended out 3 clicks when viewing without glasses. All of the eye cups on my ZR binoculars are slightly on the short side so this is a nice change not running out of eye cup length. I did view briefly with my glasses on and found that with the eye cup in the full down position, I did have to noticeably press my glasses against the eye cup in order to get the full field of view. That could be an issue for some eye glass wearers. The eye relief seemed to be slightly better at 50X than 25X. I found eye positioning very friendly at 25X and somewhat touchy at 50X, but quite workable.
The zoom on the eye piece has a nice feel to it, not to loose and not to tight. I was able to easily change the zoom without moving the scope. Rotation is even and smooth through the whole range.
The ZR Prime HD has two focus knobs, one for course and one for fine adjustments. I could hear some slight rubbing noises when rotating the course knob, but all worked great. The fine adjustment knob has a light touch so it was easy to get a sharp focus without vibrating the scope. There is very little free play in the fine adjustment. I only noticed it when I went to look for it. Rotation pressure was equal in both directions and there was no sticking. I have no complaints on the focus mechanism.
The only problem I noticed is with the foot pad. It has a rubber insert that is held in place by two small strips of double stick tape. The tape is not adequate and the insert comes out easily. I am using a basic Manfrotto tri-pod and the redesign of the foot pad is made for the Manfrotto. This should be a good match but the failure of the insert is compromising the security of the mount to some degree. I think I may go to a body shop supply store and pick up some high quality 3M double sided tape for mounting trim on the sides of cars and that should solve the problem. I will also let Charles know about the issue because I think the current approach is weak and could result in the scope coming off the mount. I currently have the scope mounted without the insert and it is more secure. One of the attached photos shows the mount with the insert. I believe the mount is rotated 90 degrees from the older ED2 model.
I still want to compare to some other scopes, but my initial impression is this is very nice scope with an excellent view. I have no regrets getting the wide angle over the standard eye piece. I would not want a more narrow field of field and I like it that the view remains sharp and bright out toward the edges. I think this was a good purchase, especially considering the price.
Note: After taking the photos I found that the eye piece has a small locking pin hole that lines up with the body lock pin when the eye piece is rotated in a different position than my initial attempt. Also a power indicator mark will then line up at the top center of the scope. In other words, I did not mount the eye piece in the preferred position for the photos.