• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Camouflage (1 Viewer)

Essex Tern

Essex Tern

🪶
Supporter
England
Camouflage - Effectiveness re UV?

Sorry if it's been discussed before, but I have never been a fan of camo clothing and refuse to wear it out of principle ;) and green for that matter!!

But on a serious note, as birds can see in ultraviolet, is camouflage clothing more of an army thing whereby it is intended to conceal from normal vision, I.e. human, and not the animal kingdom. I imagine our faces must stick out like beacons against our clothing be it camo or not. Also the different colours making up the camo may be more or less visible to uv vision, and I just wondered how effective it all is? Do any birders do the full army face paint? Never seen it but suppose it may happen!

I imagine it may all help a bit, but just wondered if anyone has any more info on the uv spectrum side of things?
 
Last edited:
Interesting idea. I've never seen birders with camo paint on their faces but I've seen plenty using camo veils and scrim and camo hats. I find some form of gloves are just as important if more so when holding a camera.

Just tried my UV light on my Jack Pyke jacket - negative results. White trainers and tee-shirts give a good reaction though!

I couldn't never decide whether it's the camo gear that helps or whether simply standing/sitting still with no sudden movements that enables closer views of birds.
 
There's no doubt that covering up your face certainly helps birds not see you but I cant see it catching on amomgst birders though i dare say some photographers might do this already.
Birds might not see the colours of the camo as we do but its more to do with breaking up your outline by having patches of different colour or many of the excellent modern 3D camo patterns so that you dont look like the shape of a person.
Not so much in this country but in others especially the USA you'll often see hunters wearing orange camo so I assume the birds dont see the orange as we do but are still fooled by the camo pattern breaking up the persons outline.
Ian is right though the most important thing of all is just staying still.
 
i wear camo clothes and even a gillie suite and iv had birds even try to land on me a couple of times so camo does work .
Imho i think that being still with camo gear on gives you just a little longer to get the shot and often its thoes extra few seconds that make either a good shot or a great shot with detail.
Rob.
 
especially the USA you'll often see hunters wearing orange camo so I assume the birds dont see the orange
Click to expand...

Deer don't see the orange but unfortunatly birds do, it is great for deerhunting in woods with other hunters around but for birdwatching it would be worse than useless. That said there is a lot more to not being seen than wearing camouflage.
 
I think wearing camouflage is much more of an "image" statement rather than of real value. On British TV how many of our serious naturalists/birdwatchers wear camouflage?
The military are using camouflage to be "invisible" to human eyes, birdwatchers need to be "invisible" to birds. Field craft is probably the key factor. Having said that I tend to wear olive green usually purchased from "country sports" shops rather than "outdoor" shops. Another advantage? of not wearing "cammo gear" is that one can safely go out shopping with the wife in town. Now there's a plus for camouflaged gear.
 
Last edited:
Robert Wallace said:
I think wearing camouflage is much more of an "image" statement rather than of real value. On British TV how many of our serious naturalists/birdwatchers wear camouflage?
.
Click to expand...

I wonder though how many of those maybe do wear camo when they arent being told what to wear to be on TV and its not exactly unusual to see people on wildlife programes wearing camo especial camera men.
Its seems to be mainly the likes of springwatch and countryfile where the presenters dont wear camo most likely because they are told not to as its not the image they wont to show.
When it comes to 'proper' ones like Ray Mears,Jonny Kingdom etc camo seems to be seen a lot more often.
 
In my experience, the camo does work; the important part being the concealment of the 'human form', as well as, hiding the face and hands (including silhouettes, and silhouettes against a skyline- it amuses me how camoed up some arrive to a venue only to stand out in the open or break a clean skyline with their silhouette) Ive been sat in an area not wearing camo, and no birds came into view. Wearing the camo/and or getting under a camo bag hide made such a difference; many birds arrived.

Regarding the UV spectrum idea, whilst interesting, I cannot confirm, but can only speak regarding what I know works for me! :)

Best wishes
 
Last edited:
Adam W said:
I wonder though how many of those maybe do wear camo when they arent being told what to wear to be on TV and its not exactly unusual to see people on wildlife programes wearing camo especial camera men.
Its seems to be mainly the likes of springwatch and countryfile where the presenters dont wear camo most likely because they are told not to as its not the image they wont to show.
When it comes to 'proper' ones like Ray Mears,Jonny Kingdom etc camo seems to be seen a lot more often.
Click to expand...

I still can't see David Attenborough wearing cammo, nor Simon King, Chris Packam, Bill Oddie and looking at photos of venerable past naturalists/photographers for example Eric Hoskin, Chisslett, Phil Hollom, Ted Eales and the first person to photograph bitterns Miss E.L.Turner, didn't either.
The important points are invisibility to birds and field craft including the ability to remain still. Nothing wrong with wearing camouflage if you feel you need to.
Ray Mears made his name thro' bushcraft (a super boy scout) although to me he seems to wear olive drab more than "cammo". Jonny Kingdom, I'd rather not comment, with or without hat.
I repeat wearing "cammo" is a style statement pure and simple. Please note I am not making any style judgements, simply sticking to function.
Please note my comments refer specifically to coats not to hiding your face behind a veil of some kind or using face paint where appropriate.
Broadly I agree with EssesTern.
 
Last edited:
Robert Wallace said:
I still can't see David Attenborough wearing cammo, nor Simon King, Chris Packam, Bill Oddie and looking at photos of venerable past naturalists/photographers for example Eric Hoskin, Chisslett, Phil Hollom, Ted Eales and the first person to photograph bitterns Miss E.L.Turner, didn't either.
The important points are invisibility to birds and field craft including the ability to remain still. Nothing wrong with wearing camouflage if you feel you need to.
Ray Mears made his name thro' bushcraft (a super boy scout) although to me he seems to wear olive drab more than "cammo". Jonny Kingdom, I'd rather not comment, with or without hat.
I repeat wearing "cammo" is a style statement pure and simple. Please note I am not making any style judgements, simply sticking to function.
Please note my comments refer specifically to coats not to hiding your face behind a veil of some kind or using face paint where appropriate.
Broadly I agree with EssesTern.
Click to expand...


I agree with you but the point i was making(which you've touched on) is people like David Attenborough,Bill Oddie etc is they are essentially TV celebrities who are also naturalists(obviously they are very passionate and knowledgeable, more than most) but people like Ray Mears,Jonny Kingdom etc are more naturalists who then became TV celebrities because of it and there clothing choices seem to perhaps reflect that a bit. You are right that Ray Mears does more often wear drab greens and browns than poper camo though i guess to an extent that is a kind of camo compared to the reds,Blues and blacks etc we often see other presenters wearing.
 
Robert Wallace said:
I still can't see David Attenborough wearing cammo, nor Simon King, Chris Packam, Bill Oddie and looking at photos of venerable past naturalists/photographers for example Eric Hoskin, Chisslett, Phil Hollom, Ted Eales and the first person to photograph bitterns Miss E.L.Turner, didn't either.
The important points are invisibility to birds and field craft including the ability to remain still. Nothing wrong with wearing camouflage if you feel you need to.
Ray Mears made his name thro' bushcraft (a super boy scout) although to me he seems to wear olive drab more than "cammo". Jonny Kingdom, I'd rather not comment, with or without hat.
I repeat wearing "cammo" is a style statement pure and simple. Please note I am not making any style judgements, simply sticking to function.
Please note my comments refer specifically to coats not to hiding your face behind a veil of some kind or using face paint where appropriate.
Broadly I agree with EssesTern.
Click to expand...

In Springwatch Simon King donned a full Ghillie Suit to try and see Wildcats in Scotland and in another one Chris Packham covered up his face quite a bit to see Nightjars whilst in the company of David Tipling who also made the effort. Even bill Oddie went full on camo when he sat on that riverbank and held out a branch for a Kingfisher to perch on, which it duly did. Other examples out there I'm sure. In my experience of wildlife watching and photography it really DOES make a difference and I'm sure if you asked any of those mentioned they'd agree.
 
In my opinion, camo works!! I have no doubt bout it and I will tell you why by givin you a bit of my experience, hoping that will help.

So far I dont have a big telezoom lense, just primes with 7D and the longest is the 100mm.
I always Loved wildlife and birds so I decided to get into birding, knowing that my equipment wasnt the best for it but well, better than nothing!!

I started by wearin the green classic camo thing and went to the mangrove next door my house, I know a spot where white faced heron come very often!!
Been stayin there steady just in front of the spot with the sun behind me, hiding back a little tree...
Some birds came; no herons; but never really close and was very obvious that the oystercatchers knew I was there because when walking searchin on the ground for worms, passing in front of me they always went further in order to avoid me.
I saw the herons flying close but they never landed to their usual spot!!

I did some research on the web, especially on bow hunting website; shame on me I know; and learnt a lot bout "camouflage"!!!
These guys cant get the same reach as the other hunters so they focus on approach and being invisible.
After that, I bought camo face paint and ghillie.
Painted my hands, my face applying the bow hunters rules in order to make it hardly identifiable and been back to the same spot with the ghillie.

Came there very slowly, hiding behind trees, tree by tree, set up my tripod, covered the equipment with the ghillie and been waiting.
The herons landed to their usual spot and the oystercatchers walked 5m in front of me.

From this day, I dont wonder anymore if being invisible is a plus or not because there is simply no doubt.
 
Last edited:
Camo probably does work, but the results are exaggerated. I also, like the TS, refuse to wear camo out of principle. It reminds me of wars and hunting. Two things a hate people doing and don't want to be associated with.

I wear a jacket of Laksen which is nice dark green and real silent. And I wear dark green trousers of Fjallraven. I never wear clothes that reflect UV. This is a great combination for me. I have had Roe within a yard. Trushes within 4 yards. Buzzard landing within 10 yards. Badgerscubs sniffing my toes, etc. etc.

I am convinced that observing without any movement and without any noise gives you wonderful experiences in nature.
 
Malloot said:
I never wear clothes that reflect UV.
Click to expand...

How do you know? We can't see UV.

Most laundry detergents seem to contain UV active components -to brighten colors-, thus you can get "special" stuff in hunting stores that doesn't .....

So washing your stuff once with the wrong soap will make you light up like a christmas tree in the woods 8-P

Ulli
 
Watched a national geographic show recently on harris's hawk's.In order for crew and commentor to closely approach nest in a saguaro cactus all wore gilly suits.Was immediately reminded of an Monty Python routine. Feel it is going far too extreme,sends a very poor message to people.Staying low,moving slow,making as little noise as possible. Then hunkering down quietly in available cover brings many rewards.I am not shrubbery.In geographic setting an example somewhat,feel they did very poorly,lost a lot of respect for them regarding nesting birds.
 
I have said it before but I am always amused when I see people in full camo gear sitting inside a hide and I am still waiting for the first 'tongue and groove' camo prints to appear for this purpose.;) Personally, I couldn't bring myself to wear camo - I am too much of a shrinking violet and couldn't bear to stand out so much.

Ron
 
On the other hand it made me smile recently when I saw a guy laying flat out somewhere on the Norfolk coast photographing snow buntings and shore birds with a very big lens and a very bright, near-flourescent jacket.

I was also surprised when I visited Trinidad that I saw signs saying anyone entering the country in possession of Camo clothing would face arrest and six months in jail. I felt glad I'd left mine at home at this point.
 
Last edited:
Quite a difference between land borne and water borne approach with shore birds,waders,many birds,mammals in general.Having various watersnakes drop in to cockpit of kayak/canoe great way spoil the day for photo's.Do believe camo serves well to break up silhouette if expanse of sky behind one is the only option.Still want to make use of any natural cover.Flat black gaffers tape is made to be non-reflective photographically,handy to have a roll in bag for many things.
 
A quote from one of our best photographers from 2003 ~ Nigel Blake:~
"I was in 'Realtree' cammo with a Realtree shroud over my 600mm lens which was mounted on a tripod, the bird sat on my lens frequently and I photographed it with a 100-400mm lens with a 25mm extension tube on set at about 220mm, it was less than 2 ft away, that's what cammo can do for you!"

That's when I started wearing cammo and it certainly works for me too.
 
Last edited:
I think it's important to remember that wildlife does not universally have the same attitude towards man. In some areas and even some countries as a whole wildlife incl. birds is much more approachable and less bothered by the presence of people. Ergo the need for camo is not a universal constant either.

For the most part here in the UK though I still very much think it brings you closer to wildlife than without.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Similar threads

Peter Kovalik
Back in black: melanin-rich skin colour
Replies
0
Views
570
Peter Kovalik
Peter Kovalik
Mendobirder
Western Isles questions
2
Replies
20
Views
999
Mendobirder
Mendobirder
dragnil
Urgent - the birds in Italy need your help
Replies
4
Views
562
SueO
SueO
R
Analysing Binoculars
Replies
6
Views
682
beacon hill
beacon hill
G
  • Article
Oliver Twist Birding
Replies
0
Views
109
Green Sandpiper
G

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top