• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Nikon Monarch 7 8 x 30 Review (1 Viewer)

TRT45

Member
While I’m definitely not as knowledgable or conversant on optics as a lot of the folks posting here, I thought I’d share some general impressions of the Nikon Monarch 7 8 x 30’s after at bit of field use.

I’m planning a trip to Tanzania with my wife in September. It’s not a birding specific trip, but I’m sure I’ll manage to see a few. My primary glass is a pair of Zeiss 8 x 42 FL’s, and I was going to let my wife use my Leica 8 x 32 BN’s. The Leicas had developed a drifting diopter issue over the years, so that the correct adjustment was about 180 degrees off the neutral hashmark. I had been trying figure out what to do about that, so I decided that rather than send them to in for a probably costly repair, to flip them online and pick up a pair of the Nikons. I haven’t had Nikon binocularsbefore, but while working part-time in a sporting goods store I had the chance to examine many Monarch riflescopes, and was very impressed the optical quality, particularly at their price point. My impression was that they were as sharp as, and brighter than many Leupold scopes costing three times as much.

Other than the known brand quality, the biggest selling point for me on the Nikons was the weight, 15 oz. as opposed to 25 oz. for the Leicas. Weigh is certainly an issue for international travel (and for smaller users, say a 5’1” 100 lb. wife). As I had a very short trip planned to Phoenix AZ to look for some thrashers, I decided to take the Nikons instead of my Zeiss.

Overall, I was very pleased with the handling and optical quality. I have fairly large hands, and holding the binos and operating the controls was not an issue. The focus was fast, but not touchy, and the eye relief for me (I am a glasses wearer) was excellent. Optically, the image was sharp and no color issues were noted. The sharpness appeared good near the edges of of the field, but I am not fanatical about that - after all, what I look at is usually centered. Contrast and low flare on backlight objects was good. And the field of view is phenomenal. A quick comparison shows them to be about equal to my Zeiss in that regard. I estimate close focus to be about 6 feet. The light weigh made them a pleasure to carry, particularly for an old guy at 6,000 ft. Ounces do count.

The only issue that cropped up was that the plastic cover piece for the front on the hinge assembly worked loose. I noticed it before it came off entirely. I’ll wrap the tip of the threaded shank with a bit of teflon tape and see if that does the trick.

To sum up, I am very pleased with them, especially at the price. I’ll probably use them locally when I don’t expect to encounter low light issues, and the size and weight will allow me to pack them as a back-up set on trips.
 
Thank you for posting your experiences with these binoculars. They have gathered quite a bit of attention here on the forums since their introduction. I have yet to try one but hope to remedy that this weekend. I have some of my favorite 8x30 class binoculars on hand for comparison. I look forward to it.
 
Thanks, Frank, I appreciate that. I did have some trepidation about posting a general review in a forum populated by optics obsessives. I do appreciate good glass - I just guess some of the meds I take for other conditions keep me from getting into it as much! But us non-specialists do appreciate the work you guys put into it and the info you share. I know it really helps me.
 
Thanks for the view and it's good to see these in practical use.

The only issue that cropped up was that the plastic cover piece for the front on the hinge assembly worked loose. I noticed it before it came off entirely.

Nikon will replace these front screws if you lose them, it's happened to me, and well worth making sure it's tightly screwed in when you obtain a new bin.
 
I learned long ago that sometimes the best reviews come from those folks that aren't obsessive about their hobby. I consider it something of a "grounding" when folks' expectations get too high. That is certainly one reason why I appreciate a review such as yours. You took the time to research a model, made an informed decision and then shared both your positive and negative experiences with us after the purchase. Couldn't ask for more.
 
Thank you for posting your experiences with these binoculars. They have gathered quite a bit of attention here on the forums since their introduction. I have yet to try one but hope to remedy that this weekend. I have some of my favorite 8x30 class binoculars on hand for comparison. I look forward to it.
Any flare issues?
 
Nothing worrisome. I did a side-by-side with my Zeiss FL's, looking into a bare tree with the direct sun just out of the field of view. The Zeiss as expected showed more contrast and detail in the shadows, but the Nikon's performed well also, with no flare significant issues.
 
Nothing worrisome. I did a side-by-side with my Zeiss FL's, looking into a bare tree with the direct sun just out of the field of view. The Zeiss as expected showed more contrast and detail in the shadows, but the Nikon's performed well also, with no flare significant issues.

Hmmmm. I wonder if they fixed the flare issues.
 
I just wanted to chime in here because I finally had the opportunity to briefly evaluate the Nikon M7 8x30s.

All I want to say is that I was floored by them. Really. Loved everything about them from the optical performance to their fit in my hand (texture in particular). The large oculars coupled with the relatively thin diameter eyecups, their wide field of view and specific level of eye relief made the experience quite memorable. The image seemed expansive and immersive. Loved the apparent brightness, sharpness and color representation. Sweet spot size seemed quite generous considering how wide their field of view is.

I want one.

Now I just have to find a place that is selling them for less than the $380 they usually go for. ;)
 
These are presently USD$ 300.00 in Japan, USD$ 430.00 here in the UK (including sales tax).

I'd be happy to buy these at $380.00, it's more or less equivalent to the cost of the NM5 here. :eat:
 
All I want to say is that I was floored by them. Really. Loved everything about them from the optical performance to their fit in my hand (texture in particular). The large oculars coupled with the relatively thin diameter eyecups, their wide field of view and specific level of eye relief made the experience quite memorable. The image seemed expansive and immersive. Loved the apparent brightness, sharpness and color representation. Sweet spot size seemed quite generous considering how wide their field of view is.

Frank:

Did you have a chance to try them in the field? The one I tried had quite obvious problems with veiling glare under a bright sky with thin clouds.

Hermann
 
Hermann,

I spent about an hour with them on the large deck of an conservation science center. I was comparing the Monarch 7 to two Opticron models, a Leupold and the Ziss Onquest HD. Sky was semi cloudy at the time. I didn't notice any stray light issues with them. With so many variables that come into play with that type of performance concern I can't really comment further. If I can wrangle an evaluation pair off of Mike Friedberg then I will be sure to check for it.

Andre,

I did try a pair of 8x32 LXLs at the center but not in direct comparison to the M7s. Going by memory the M7s view was brighter with better contrast and more immersive overall in experience. The LXLs had notably better edge performance all be it with a 25 foot narrower field of view. I will try to post more later but am typing this on my cell phone so want to keep this brief.

The M7 was certainly lighter in weight as well.

Samandag,

I definitely wasn't complaining about the $380 price they sell for here. They are certainly worth it....and then some. I was more complaining about not having the $380 right now to buy it. ;)
 
Frank:

Did you have a chance to try them in the field? The one I tried had quite obvious problems with veiling glare under a bright sky with thin clouds.

Hermann
Me too. I don't think Frank had enough time to see these glare problems. They were definitely there with my pair.
 
To elaborate, during my recent Arizona day trip I was in the field for 11 hours, from 7AM to 6PM, under a bright desert sun with intermittent light clouds, and experienced no noticeable flare issues at any time during the day or under any viewing attitude. Certainly nothing of the magnitude that seems to be at issue. For clarification, is the type of flare being mentioned the type that is a result of a poorly baffled/matted interior optics path?
 
To elaborate, during my recent Arizona day trip I was in the field for 11 hours, from 7AM to 6PM, under a bright desert sun with intermittent light clouds, and experienced no noticeable flare issues at any time during the day or under any viewing attitude. Certainly nothing of the magnitude that seems to be at issue. For clarification, is the type of flare being mentioned the type that is a result of a poorly baffled/matted interior optics path?
Yes. The flare occurs more in low light conditions and is like a veiling glare.
 
Last edited:
Hermann,

I spent about an hour with them on the large deck of an conservation science center. I was comparing the Monarch 7 to two Opticron models, a Leupold and the Ziss Onquest HD. Sky was semi cloudy at the time. I didn't notice any stray light issues with them. With so many variables that come into play with that type of performance concern I can't really comment further. If I can wrangle an evaluation pair off of Mike Friedberg then I will be sure to check for it.

Andre,

I did try a pair of 8x32 LXLs at the center but not in direct comparison to the M7s. Going by memory the M7s view was brighter with better contrast and more immersive overall in experience. The LXLs had notably better edge performance all be it with a 25 foot narrower field of view. I will try to post more later but am typing this on my cell phone so want to keep this brief.

The M7 was certainly lighter in weight as well.

Samandag,

I definitely wasn't complaining about the $380 price they sell for here. They are certainly worth it....and then some. I was more complaining about not having the $380 right now to buy it. ;)

Frank,

If you do "wrangle" a pair off Mike, please ask if you can send it to me after you're through, so I could take a look. No stores in my area carry this model, only the M3 and M5.

Btw, what did you think of the 8x30 M7's focuser speed? I tried the Terra ED yesterday -- liked the image, liked the ergonomics and eyegonomics, liked the weight and balance, but the focuser was way too fast.

Brock

Sent from my Commodore 64,
 
Frank,

If you do "wrangle" a pair off Mike, please ask if you can send it to me after you're through, so I could take a look. No stores in my area carry this model, only the M3 and M5.

Btw, what did you think of the 8x30 M7's focuser speed? I tried the Terra ED yesterday -- liked the image, liked the ergonomics and eyegonomics, liked the weight and balance, but the focuser was way too fast.

Brock

Hey Brock,

If you want to borrow our 8x30 M7 for a week, you are welcome to do so if you are willing to pay for postage. It is currently on it's way to Steve C, so he will have it for a week or two. He could mail it to you when he is finished, and then you could mail it back to me. PM me if this is something that interests you.

Phil
 
Well I caved and ordered a pair from B and H. I hate to rely on Bill Me Later but the temptation was too great after my experience with them at Cape May. They are due in later today. I plan on comparing them directly to the Leupold Mojave and the Sightron SIIs. Will report my findings as time allows.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top