Barred Wobbler
Well-known member
His high opinion of birders shines through in his various comments.
Last edited:
Whatever the pros and cons, and who's responsible or not — the lack of location is hampering identification by preventing others from getting more photos that might make identification much easier. The area is not infested with grouse moor gamekeepers, so the bird is not at risk. Please publicise the location!
Shame!It's history now in any case. From what I can gather from the posts on that site, it's gone.
Probably a Monty's. But enough uncertainty with the possibility of a Pallid (or even a hybrid; they do occur) that I'd think it's very unlikely that the County Records Committee will be able to make a firm decision on the current evidence.A lost migrant juv monty
Whatever the pros and cons, and who's responsible or not — the lack of location is hampering identification by preventing others from getting more photos that might make identification much easier. The area is not infested with grouse moor gamekeepers, so the bird is not at risk. Please publicise the location!
To me this is fairly clear-cut Pallid harrier.
The pale crown is of little relevance since both Pallid and Monty's may show this feature in juvenile plumage. On the other the combination of rather pale head (pale crown and relatively pale nape) and the dark cheek-patch largely reaching the malar area is not at all common in Montagu's, but still fairly typical for Pallid.
The wingtip to tail ration has already been mentionned and while this may not be a bullet-proof feature, the wingtip falling well short of the tailtip strongly favours Pallid has other have mentionned. In term of general appearance, this translates into a rather stocky bird lacking the attenuated rear end of Monty's.
But I will mainly also insist of the face pattern. Once you have your eyes tuned into it, the aggressive face pattern of a juv Pallid is readily told from the "goofy" face of a juv Monty's and will be in most cases instantly recognizable. I believe it to be the case here.
To give a bit more details:
- note how the supercilium appear narrow, rather long (starting well in front of the eye) with and up-turned rear end. This would be extremely unusual for a Monty's which normaly shows a shortish, broader supercilium that wraps around the rear-end of the eye.
- note also the size discrepancy between the supercilium and the white Crescent below the eye. In the overwhelming majority of juv Monty's, the supercilium and the crescent are approximatively of the same size while this descrepancy is very typical for juv Pallid.
And while it might be a bit far-fetched, there is a bit of primary pattern visible. Best seen on that pic I think: http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/538007/cat/recent/limit/recent
The outer primaries seem to show a rather short and well defined black-tip implying that the fingers are mostly pale...
The outer primaries seem to show a rather short and well defined black-tip implying that the fingers are mostly pale...
I agree that the primaries do show a dark tip but wouldn't that lead to a dark surround (trailing edge) to the primaries (newest picture). I'm in no way getting involved with what it is - this is out of my league - just asking...
Tricky. Should the collar and dark boa be more defined for Pallid?