Not sure whether your referring to my posts as being 'bitching' or 'point scoring' - but I can only repeat that, Malta's legislation and infrastructure on hunting within it's national borders does not adequately comply with the requirements of the Birds Directive. Directives have direct effect on Member States in that the European Commission can initiate legal action in the ECJ. Like many others, I've written to Euro MPs, signed Petitions and helped bring it to attention to everyone I come across. It's fine to discuss/debate the issue on a Bird Forum, in addition to the above, but we need to be clear that Malta is in breach of her obligations under European Law. As a member of the Community, that is not tenable.
Changing laws, changing political attitudes, changing cultural opinions is negotiable through campaigning, politics, education etc but is a long term process and one that we are all entitled to participate in - indeed, many of us do just that as are birders such as Adin, living as he does in Malta - but if a Law is already in place and it's being broken, in eyes of the Courts, that's non-negotiable. It's illegal. Period. The first duty is to try and stop the massacres immediately through enforcement in Malta by presence on the ground by BL/Proact, Maltese policing and the European Courts . No amount of socialist pandering, psychological profiling or projections of one's own frustrations about politics in general onto the situation in Malta is going to change anything in the short term. You don't place a table in the middle of a battle ground in the hope of reconciliation talks, you must first of all have at least a temporary cessation of hostilities and recognition of the rule of law as a primary prerequisite to the long term goals of compromise and mutual understanding.