• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Gull ID help please. Cambridgeshire, UK (1 Viewer)

Milan

Member
Hi fellow bird enthusiasts;).

I noticed this gull on a partially flooded (and frozen) meadow just on the edge of Cambridge (UK) this morning. This one attracted my attention as it landed, briefly, not far away from a small group of black headed gulls. Based on the overall appearance I initially thought it might be Common Gull however after closer inspection of the image I made I'm leaning toward Ring-billed gull (colour of legs, light coloured iris). I'm not an gull ID expert so any comments and help with ID would be appreciated.

Thank You in advance.
 

Attachments

  • 2021_02_14_MO_Birds__2140304_41439.jpg
    2021_02_14_MO_Birds__2140304_41439.jpg
    175.5 KB · Views: 84
it's a nominate canus Common Gull on wingpattern. i noticed a high degree of ind. with paler iris in wintering common gulls in eastern europe this winter which hints towards a larger percentage of wintering ssp. heinei (russian common gull), but of course a paler iris can be shown by european birds too.
 
Hi Lou

Do you have a visual reference link please that shows the comparative wing pattern in nominate and heinei - are you referring to moult timing patterns vis a vis the time of year or do they actually differ?
 
there is a sophisticated scoring system for identification of all subspecies of Larus canus, created by top gullers Peter Adriaens and Chris Gibbins published in Dutch Birding four years ago. Generally, heinei in winter have brighter bare parts, less head striation (just a necklace), longer wings (hard to tell in the field), and more black in wing, black often reaching p4, with p9 mirror being smaller (same length as black tip), inner web to p8 reaching primary coverts and p6-p7 lacking obvious/broad pale "moons" (=whitish marks between grey bases and black subterminal marks). that's about what i recall of the differences, but there's a lot of overlap (thus the scoring system) and intergrades seem to be common. i have no direct comparison material. the article is here:
http://gull-research.org/papers/pap...S2FlNtFNdqgZ1tSfXazjikWrcAOMGuMMdkDFQWPlgFyfY

or if you don't like to read for days, this is an older one from 2016 concerning identification of ssp. heinei in a scottish context :): http://gull-research.org/papers/papers9/Gulls_SB36(1) 2016 heinei Common Gulls.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3OQssElyzwKnvr7xOGf6yn0H42Cpo23J4hkNB4D6Fu2uM5hGenhLw5WDE
 
Last edited:
there's no mirrors on p6-7, just occasionally on p8 in Common Gull. don't get the question really.
mirrors are on p9 and 10, and yes, they are large as in nominate canus. also note lack of any p5 mark which readily excludes a russian heinei.
 
the white tips are there in p6-8, i think their size is of no relevance for subsp. identification. p9 and 10 usually lack a white tip in common gull. actually p9 often has a very small white tip. we're talking about adult birds only, of course.
 
it's a nominate canus Common Gull on wingpattern. i noticed a high degree of ind. with paler iris in wintering common gulls in eastern europe this winter which hints towards a larger percentage of wintering ssp. heinei (russian common gull), but of course a paler iris can be shown by european birds too.
Thanks Lou. Very interesting!
 
there is a sophisticated scoring system for identification of all subspecies of Larus canus, created by top gullers Peter Adriaens and Chris Gibbins published in Dutch Birding four years ago. Generally, heinei in winter have brighter bare parts, less head striation (just a necklace), longer wings (hard to tell in the field), and more black in wing, black often reaching p4, with p9 mirror being smaller (same length as black tip), inner web to p8 reaching primary coverts and p6-p7 lacking obvious/broad pale "moons" (=whitish marks between grey bases and black subterminal marks). that's about what i recall of the differences, but there's a lot of overlap (thus the scoring system) and intergrades seem to be common. i have no direct comparison material. the article is here:
http://gull-research.org/papers/pap...S2FlNtFNdqgZ1tSfXazjikWrcAOMGuMMdkDFQWPlgFyfY

or if you don't like to read for days, this is an older one from 2016 concerning identification of ssp. heinei in a scottish context :): http://gull-research.org/papers/papers9/Gulls_SB36(1) 2016 heinei Common Gulls.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3OQssElyzwKnvr7xOGf6yn0H42Cpo23J4hkNB4D6Fu2uM5hGenhLw5WDE
Hi Lou. That is an excellent resource! Thanks for sharing this.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 3 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top