• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

gulls (12 Viewers)

Herastrau, February 18th.
 

Attachments

  • P2184347m.jpg
    P2184347m.jpg
    203.1 KB · Views: 34
  • P2184348m.jpg
    P2184348m.jpg
    174.1 KB · Views: 30
  • P2184352m.jpg
    P2184352m.jpg
    165.8 KB · Views: 37
  • P2184353m.jpg
    P2184353m.jpg
    203.5 KB · Views: 31
  • P2184354m.jpg
    P2184354m.jpg
    206.3 KB · Views: 42
gulp. nice to revise one more myth - "cachinnans shouldn't show such accentuated smudges around eye". in the 17.-19.th february series there's a lot of them! e.g. in this one from above: http://www.birdforum.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=371902&d=1330538422 or the right hand down bird here (i really struggled a bit with it - mich?): http://www.birdforum.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=371903&d=1330538440 ... errr - it's the same bird ;)
always interesting to see large numbers of such varying species at a time.

today (29.2.) sebi and cipi where at herastrau. they sent me a pic with a very dark mich (thinking of argie). another bird photogr. at sunday indeed could be an argie though (but could be a dark micha also, just a front view unfortunately)...
 
Last edited:
no they didn't see it, but instead they thought to have photogr. a 2cy LBBG which ended to be another dwarfy michahellis ;) ; your bird is a yellow-legged too. (gosh, they are returning to herastrau finally B :))

pic 1: the suggested "LBBG" michahellis ;)
pic 2-4: another dark mich (which was suspected to be an argie), very advanced with even rectrices 4-6 renewed - edit: probably only r6.; in pic 4 together with your friend pontic gull from 28.02. (nice to see that side to side with an advanced and totally different looking mich!)
 

Attachments

  • 2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3155.jpg
    2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3155.jpg
    228 KB · Views: 39
  • 2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3174 - Kopie.jpg
    2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3174 - Kopie.jpg
    235.8 KB · Views: 37
  • 2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3179 - Kopie.jpg
    2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3179 - Kopie.jpg
    235.2 KB · Views: 39
  • 2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3194 - Kopie.jpg
    2 2012.02.29 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3194 - Kopie.jpg
    161.6 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
the presumed argie/mich? from sunday, just 2 frontviews...
greater coverts look checkered.
 

Attachments

  • 2 2012.02.26 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3001 Q!.jpg
    2 2012.02.26 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3001 Q!.jpg
    244.7 KB · Views: 39
  • 2 2012.02.26 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3002 Q!.jpg
    2 2012.02.26 herastrau sebastian bugariu DSC_3002 Q!.jpg
    225.3 KB · Views: 31
I agree that my bird looks good for a female micha.
I hope that I will be able to prepare for web (in the next few days) my photos with gulls taken in Herastrau on February 18th and 21st and to upload them here...
This morning (March 1st) I saw a lot of gulls again (Caspian, Common, BH) but I didn't took pictures (it was foggy).
 
Last edited:
Herastrau, March 2nd 2012. Same bird in pics 1 and 2. Another bird in pics 3, 4 & 5.
 

Attachments

  • P3025949m.jpg
    P3025949m.jpg
    172.9 KB · Views: 37
  • P3025952m.jpg
    P3025952m.jpg
    198 KB · Views: 33
  • P3026005m.jpg
    P3026005m.jpg
    205.2 KB · Views: 41
  • P3026007m.jpg
    P3026007m.jpg
    227.5 KB · Views: 90
  • P3026010m.jpg
    P3026010m.jpg
    251.3 KB · Views: 40
Last edited:
Herastrau, February 18th (again).
 

Attachments

  • P2184356m.jpg
    P2184356m.jpg
    153.8 KB · Views: 35
  • P2184357m.jpg
    P2184357m.jpg
    149 KB · Views: 34
  • P2184360m.jpg
    P2184360m.jpg
    97.2 KB · Views: 37
  • P2184361m.jpg
    P2184361m.jpg
    126.5 KB · Views: 31
  • P2184390m.jpg
    P2184390m.jpg
    104.3 KB · Views: 38
More pics February 18th.
 

Attachments

  • P2184413m.jpg
    P2184413m.jpg
    119.4 KB · Views: 38
  • P2184414m.jpg
    P2184414m.jpg
    118.1 KB · Views: 30
  • P2184416m.jpg
    P2184416m.jpg
    153.6 KB · Views: 36
  • P2184419m.jpg
    P2184419m.jpg
    109.3 KB · Views: 32
  • P2184424m.jpg
    P2184424m.jpg
    163.8 KB · Views: 57
Five more, February 18th.
 

Attachments

  • P2184426m.jpg
    P2184426m.jpg
    142 KB · Views: 40
  • P2184428m.jpg
    P2184428m.jpg
    98 KB · Views: 29
  • P2184432m.jpg
    P2184432m.jpg
    129.3 KB · Views: 24
  • P2184440m.jpg
    P2184440m.jpg
    135.6 KB · Views: 27
  • P2184448m.jpg
    P2184448m.jpg
    159.8 KB · Views: 50
all 3rd and 4th cycle types (4cy and 5cy) in posts 2349-2352) definitely are caspians, visible in the grey tongues in outer primaries (upper- and underwing). pale irides aren't rare (at least 30% show such pale ones in adults, less so in 3rd cycles, like in the one #2350).
the 4th cycle (5cy, cristian ;)) type in 2349 has a primary pattern perfectly fitting an older adult with long grey tongues, litlle black on underwing (nice typical cach "halfmoon") and large mirrors. just the dark smudges on right primary coverts (assymmetrical, since left ones are grey) and some black in tail give away the younger age. in other species we know examples of older aged birds (6cy, 7cy?) still showing rests of black in tail. sexing is hard in this ind.- it could be a strong female, could be a lighter weighted male.
the one in 2352 also is a 4th cycle type. i say type because at this age it is not secure to age it 100%. with those large mirrors, no black in tail and largish apical spots it should be older than 4cy however.

http://www.birdforum.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=372133&d=1330700673: note the extreme angle in hindcrown and very heavy bill in the male 2cy - caspians can have such 'rectangular' crowns together with a flat forehead in certain moods/statures.

also, again there is this tricky 2cy in 2350 (pics 1-2) showing features of both cach and mich. it might be a michahellis though but i'm far from sure. same bird, left side is this http://www.birdforum.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=372253&d=1330775797 but now it looks much more like a mich...very few replaced coverts for YLG.
 
Last edited:
Five more pics, February 18th.
 

Attachments

  • P2184465m.jpg
    P2184465m.jpg
    155.9 KB · Views: 35
  • P2184466m.jpg
    P2184466m.jpg
    151.3 KB · Views: 30
  • P2184467m.jpg
    P2184467m.jpg
    165.4 KB · Views: 32
  • P2184468m.jpg
    P2184468m.jpg
    174.4 KB · Views: 22
  • P2184472m.jpg
    P2184472m.jpg
    211.8 KB · Views: 40
pale irides aren't rare (at least 30% show such pale ones in adults, less so in 3rd cycles, like in the one #2350).
the 4th cycle (5cy, cristian ;)) type in 2349 has a primary pattern perfectly fitting an older adult with long grey tongues, litlle black on underwing (nice typical cach "halfmoon") and large mirrors.

Thanks Lou and Cristian. I agree with you completely although I don't think 30% of the adult/sub adult birds on the Thames have pale irides. But nevertheless, some do.

Cheers, Andy.
 
Last edited:
Five more pics, February 18th.

I could write pages about the 2cy birds in that last photo: a mix of grey scaps, barred scaps, black centred scaps and then there's the wing coverts and the difference in moult and so on!

If I could choose one image to demonstrate the varied appearance and moult of 1st winter Caspians to go into a book, Cristian, then that picture would be the one I'd choose.

Cheers, Andy.
 
And five more (February 18th). In the last pic another dwarf.
 

Attachments

  • P2184473m.jpg
    P2184473m.jpg
    113.3 KB · Views: 20
  • P2184475m.jpg
    P2184475m.jpg
    181 KB · Views: 27
  • P2184476m.jpg
    P2184476m.jpg
    200.8 KB · Views: 35
  • P2184477m.jpg
    P2184477m.jpg
    181.1 KB · Views: 36
  • P2184480m.jpg
    P2184480m.jpg
    77.9 KB · Views: 46
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top