JANJ
Well-known member
Hi Lou.
Regarding the Danish Gull, cachinnans or michahellis, not so straight forward in my opinion. Taken early in the season and rather fresh juvenile - explained by the dark head, which is quite ordinary in juveniles. Not the so called typical cachinnans jizz maybe, especially head shape, bill alright for a male type though. Tertials not seen from above - which would have been a good thing. The photographer - who seem to know his gulls, simply answer the question above that it is a normal cachinnans. The above comment question the gull and propose michahellis due to heavy bill, with obvious 'hook', dark eye-mask, patttern on the scapulars, darkish overall, jizz and head shape, fair questions the photographer chose to ignore!
I agree with the photographer, but realise that it´s still not always that easy to determine between certain michahellis and cachinnans, and I´m not sure if there are detailes in the feather groups that will settle arguments, du to variation and sometimes perhaps hybridization.
Check fresh cachinnans here:
http://www.bongariliitto.fi/kuvat/11_Rantalinnut/11h_Lokit/index_content.html
Same date as the Danish:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~rauste/g/data/pics/C_IMG_43177.jpg
http://www.helsinki.fi/~rauste/g/data/pics/C_IMG_41765.jpg
JanJ
Regarding the Danish Gull, cachinnans or michahellis, not so straight forward in my opinion. Taken early in the season and rather fresh juvenile - explained by the dark head, which is quite ordinary in juveniles. Not the so called typical cachinnans jizz maybe, especially head shape, bill alright for a male type though. Tertials not seen from above - which would have been a good thing. The photographer - who seem to know his gulls, simply answer the question above that it is a normal cachinnans. The above comment question the gull and propose michahellis due to heavy bill, with obvious 'hook', dark eye-mask, patttern on the scapulars, darkish overall, jizz and head shape, fair questions the photographer chose to ignore!
I agree with the photographer, but realise that it´s still not always that easy to determine between certain michahellis and cachinnans, and I´m not sure if there are detailes in the feather groups that will settle arguments, du to variation and sometimes perhaps hybridization.
Check fresh cachinnans here:
http://www.bongariliitto.fi/kuvat/11_Rantalinnut/11h_Lokit/index_content.html
Same date as the Danish:
http://www.helsinki.fi/~rauste/g/data/pics/C_IMG_43177.jpg
http://www.helsinki.fi/~rauste/g/data/pics/C_IMG_41765.jpg
JanJ