Yes, well, He also summarized in the last sentence, "To me, the NL Pure appears perfect, with the only exception being its occasionally erratic stray light behavior.'
You and Henry seem to like that above paragraph to justify the glare drum beat thing. If Holger says theyre perfect and glare is occasional and erratic (meaning for those who see it and dont know how to deal with it), Im in. Thats different. Isnt this path a bit worn by now?
The question we should be talking about, allowing that glare is a thing for some, is how many? What percent of bino users see glare? How many actually recognize its a thing? 2%, 20%, 50%? The time allotted to this conversation over years, if the percent of folks who're bothered by it is small, then what are we doing? How about a sticky, that once and for all sits at the top of Bino subform explains that glare is a thing for some X% of folks who look through binos. We understand that, we acknowledge that. for those folks some brands and models seem to have it more, yada yada....
Come on Lee