Ted, thanks. Actually, the answers to some of my qns. are already in your previous posts, which I had read when "stalking" your comments on the ZR, and now remembered on reading again.
Sorry and very surprised to hear about that quality problem! Not great news for us in lands unexplored (by the ZR network), but it's the second time I heard of such a thing, the first being from Dennis, whose exact problem I don't quite remember. That "first week" is not surely the very first? I don't think you told us anythign of it. Hope the bin is perfect for a long time after that's fixed, or you can work out some replacement logistics.
I'm not so lucky with the field of view. I, too wear thick - 4.5 dioptre - specs, but cannot see anything like the full field without mighty and impracticable efforts. Now - this is v. impt. to me - do you actually see a noticeably wider field than you did in the ZR ED3 8x43 (which is unusualy wide for an 8x)? Thanks.
Sorry and very surprised to hear about that quality problem! Not great news for us in lands unexplored (by the ZR network), but it's the second time I heard of such a thing, the first being from Dennis, whose exact problem I don't quite remember. That "first week" is not surely the very first? I don't think you told us anythign of it. Hope the bin is perfect for a long time after that's fixed, or you can work out some replacement logistics.
I'm not so lucky with the field of view. I, too wear thick - 4.5 dioptre - specs, but cannot see anything like the full field without mighty and impracticable efforts. Now - this is v. impt. to me - do you actually see a noticeably wider field than you did in the ZR ED3 8x43 (which is unusualy wide for an 8x)? Thanks.
Last edited: