• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Search results

  1. C

    The APM 6.5x32 ED IF, compared to the APM 6x30 – A Few Thoughts

    Ah, that's why the focuser works so smoothly on my sample? "A spoonful of oil helps the focuser go round" .....
  2. C

    The APM 6.5x32 ED IF, compared to the APM 6x30 – A Few Thoughts

    I find them actually very comfortable to use. I was a bit afraid of their large diameter, since I have a relatively narrow IPD, but I find the ease of view great. The only thing I could complain about is that the rubber eyecups come off too easily when I try to fold them down (which I usually...
  3. C

    The APM 6.5x32 ED IF, compared to the APM 6x30 – A Few Thoughts

    Since Holger Merlitz noticed that the exit pupils appear smaller than they should, I measured the specifications of the APM (yes, I know, I have a pedantic bent:(), see https://binocular.ch/12117-2/ One could say that this is a 6.7x31 binocular, not 6.5x32, but specs are in fact relatively...
  4. C

    The APM 6.5x32 ED IF, compared to the APM 6x30 – A Few Thoughts

    Just realize Hermann did an almost similar comparison: „APM 6.5x32 APO - Some first impressions“ see his thread here on BF (coming to similar conclusions (y)) https://www.birdforum.net/threads/apm-6-5x32-apo-some-first-impressions.455020/unread MODERATORS, can you please merge this thread...
  5. C

    The APM 6.5x32 ED IF, compared to the APM 6x30 – A Few Thoughts

    I do like the APM 6x30, but have never been a huge fan of it. I like it for its compact size, good ergonomics, nice finish, smooth focus and mechanical robustness. The optics are good, but I always found them somewhat underwhelming – despite a nice field of view, good central sharpness, good...
Back
Top