• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Flash or higher ISO when shooting from a hide (1 Viewer)

ndwgolf

Active member
On saturday I was invited to a birding shoot in Southern Thailand with 3 other keen birders. The first location was amazing and we saw many many different kinds of small birds (I mean really small like the size of your thumb small). I was shooting with my Nikon D500 and Nikon 600mm f4 and both sitting on a sturdy tripod with a Wimberley gimbal head.

The hide was about 3 to 6 meters from the various perches.

It was a hot sunny day (bloody hot in the hide) but even with the sun out I guess the canopy blocked a lot of that light out because even at f4 I was struggling to stay below ISO1000 (my auto ISO was set at 100/3200 at 1/400 (im shooting at ~900mm) and a lot of my shots were at 3200......especially later in the day.

One of the other guys was using a Canon cropped sensor camera and a 100/600mm lens with a flash mounted on the camera. When I asked him why he was using flash he said to keep the ISO below 400. I don't own an on camera flash so that option wasn't available for me.

So my question to the gang is this;
1/. Should I go out and buy a flash
2/. Next time use my off camera flash with a big umbrella
3/. Increase the ISO and painstakingly try and clean up the digital noise

I had an amazing two days and cant wait to do it again

I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on this.

Below is a before and after shot that I took yesterday shot at F5 1/200 ISO 3200
 

Attachments

  • Before.jpg
    Before.jpg
    735.8 KB · Views: 10
  • After.jpg
    After.jpg
    532.2 KB · Views: 14
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top