Hi all,
Great discussion - now things are getting rather interesting.
Firstly, thanks to AJDH for posting such good quality photos that we can get our teeth into.
I'm still going with
Isabelline. Because...
1) Firstly, whilst I agree that my usual mental image of Issy is 'brown all over', remember that this photo was taken in spring in the Middle East, and not autumn in NW Europe. Worn, adult spring Issy's are darker with more grey on the back than fresh birds in autumn.
2) Whilst I agree JanJ's comments that the bird apperance changes as the posture in the photos change, I think that the 'side-on' image is more reliable than the 'front-on' pics - the feather tracks, particularly around the face, are in a more natural position.
3) Also agreed that standing up straight is a great Issy field characteristic, I don't think we can read too much into the fact that this one isn't. I personally don't think we should make any conclusions on this front from three photos.
4) I still think that the plumage features I detailed in my first post still hold and still point towards Issy. I can't see an adult female spring Northern looking like this?
Here's a couple of pics to show what I mean. Firstly, an adult Issy - not the bill size, back colouration and alula / covert contrast:
http://www.alsirhan.com/images/Isabelline_Wheatear_sc3.jpg
Now, compare that to this spring (April) adult female Northern:
http://www.birds-of-denmark.dk/stenpikker.htmhttp://www.birds-of-denmark.dk/stenpikker.htm
Cheers,
Ben