• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Valparaiso (Chile). Two questions about Bird range (1 Viewer)

AlanR

Bird photographer
United Kingdom
[1] Cattle Egret:
I saw a group of about a dozen Egrets in a field of cattle between Valparaiso and Santiago (on a coach, so not time for a photograph). Could these have been Cattle Egrets?
[2] Giant Petrel:
Seen at Valparaiso Harbour, I assume these very large birds are Southern Giant Petrels. Does this fit in with their known range?
Pictures are not very good. First was taken early in the morning, so the dark colour may be unreal. This bird was gliding at about half a metre above the water (hence the shadow).Second picture, about 5 p.m was of three black and white looking birds flying away much too fast for me.
Both questions relate to yesterday.
Alan
 
Last edited:
Picus-viridis said:
[1] Cattle Egret:
I saw a group of about a dozen Egrets in a field of cattle between Valparaiso and Santiago (on a coach, so not time for a photograph). Could these have been Cattle Egrets?

Almost certainly. Cattle, Snowy, and Great Egrets are all widespread in Chile (according to Jaramillo's _Birds of Chile_), but the setting, and the fact that they were in a flock, makes Cattle by far the most likely.

[2] Giant Petrel:
Seen at Valparaiso Harbour, I assume these very large birds are Southern Giant Petrels. Does this fit in with their known range?

As noted they're Peruvian Pelicans (the only pelican expected in Chile).
 
Thanks for the replies.
Communications are getting difficult as we have intermittent satellite access down in the Pacific (not helped by increasing time-zone shift).
Alan
 
Warning! This thread is more than 17 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top