Anybody notice these yet?
http://store.bruntonoutdoor.com/optics/binoculars/brunton-icon/brunton-icon-trade-8x44-brown/
Saw an advertisement in a bowhunting mag and looked it up on the net. Did a little search of the binocular forum but could not find any previous discussions.
I see several issues which I am sure which will jump out at many of you.
;-)
Holy Cow! This is just too coincidental. The Navy Seals finally get their man, and Frank D. suddenly appears back on BF? How long is your furlough, Frank?
While you were off in parts unknown, we broached this subject a while ago. Besides what has already been mentioned, my comment was that the "H" design seems to be "this year's model".
The Swaro SLC-HD, the Leupold Northfolk, the Nikon EDG II, and some other brands seem to be adopting this slim, single rear bridge design. Not sure how sturdy this design is in general or specifically for the aforementioned models, but for the big handed, who need more "real estate" (to coin Ed's term), this is a welcomed change.
Not sure why the Icons are priced so high. Brunton is HQ in Riverton, Wyoming, but I seriously doubt if their bins are made in the USA or they would be plastering that fact all over their ads.
According to this site, Brunton had been owned by a Swedish company, which in 2006 was bought by Fiskars Corporation, which I looked up and found was a Finnish company, by golly.
http://www.thebinocularsite.com/brunton/
So if they are made in Northern Europe, that could explain the high price.
As far as the FOV, the 8.5x43 Epochs, which I thought were pretty expensive back in the day when $1,395 sounded very expensive, have a 7* FOV. While not tunnelesque, thanks to the 8.5x, it's still not as generous as say the 8x42 Meopta, which can be had for less $.
Brunton seems to follow Minox's earlier model of being conservative with the FOV while still charging an arm and leg. Minox found out that didn't work, so now they increased the FOV in their top models, make them in Germany, and charge an arm and two legs (got to leave you with one arm to hold the bins).
Anyway, the Swaro SLCs are still a far better value than the Bruntons. And the Meopta even better yet, if they got the yellow out like Pepsodent.
Which reminds me, we had a semantic argument while you were away, about what you meant when you said the newer Meopta B1s were more color neutral than the older models (which had a yellow bias), but they were not as neutral as the 8x32 model (which is clearly aimed at birders from Meopta's Webpage on them).
Then our resident contrarian chimed in and said that you did not say the new Meoptas were at all yellow, but more color neutral. Yeah, more color neutral than the yellow biased ones. It went on like that without resolution.
This all started when a certain Miss Lulubelle from the Lone Star State inquired if the Meoptas differed from Cabela's 10x42 Euros and if so, how they differed.
I found a thread about this issue on another forum with a post by a rep from Meopta who wrote that the coatings betwn the two were different (though he didn't go into further detail). Forget the exact wording, I'll have to look it up, but his emphasis sounded like he was saying the Meopta had better coatings.
So then Miss Lulubelle called someone at Meopta or was it Cabela's? and was told that the the latest issues were indeed the same binoculars (one with warts, one without), and that they now had dielectric coatings.
So that's where we left it. Perhaps you can clarify the color bias/neutrality.
How color neutral are the new Meopta B1s?
How yellow biased were the originals?
You can use this color chart so we are all on the same page:
http://beaufortsjeweler.com/images/diamond_color_chart.gif
Brock