Just thought I would ask for an opinion on these. The 8x42 model has been reviewed very favorably in the press, and the 8.5x45 model has been reviewed highly by end users at the various e-tailers.
It looks like the design favors edge sharpness over FOV.
I haven't noticed whether the design uses a "dielectric" coating on the prisms, only that they are phase corrected. Yet the Endeavor ED 8x42 model seems to outperform the Vortex Viper 8x42, a much more costly binocular, which (I think) does have dielectric coating.
Even Pentax treats the prisms of one of their line in the $200 range, with silver, rather than dielectric. It has also been reviewed favorably, but I doubt it is up to the performance of most any design using ED glass. I guess it also depends on the particular type of roof prism, as to whether a metallic coating would help, but I could be wrong.
If this post gets a bunch of views and no replies like my other one, then you're all a bunch of stuffed shirts!
It looks like the design favors edge sharpness over FOV.
I haven't noticed whether the design uses a "dielectric" coating on the prisms, only that they are phase corrected. Yet the Endeavor ED 8x42 model seems to outperform the Vortex Viper 8x42, a much more costly binocular, which (I think) does have dielectric coating.
Even Pentax treats the prisms of one of their line in the $200 range, with silver, rather than dielectric. It has also been reviewed favorably, but I doubt it is up to the performance of most any design using ED glass. I guess it also depends on the particular type of roof prism, as to whether a metallic coating would help, but I could be wrong.
If this post gets a bunch of views and no replies like my other one, then you're all a bunch of stuffed shirts!